this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
167 points (97.7% liked)

politics

24084 readers
3803 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The IRS is showcasing its new capability to audit high-income tax dodgers aggressively as it makes the case for sustained funding and tries to avoid budget cuts sought by Republicans who want to gut the agency

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dontcallmewoody@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes. If we really want rich people to pay proportionally (or even progressively), then we will need to change the laws that allow them to amass huge fortunes tax free.

When Bezos and Musk can amass hundreds of billions of net worth without ever hitting a six figure income, you know the problem is with the laws, not with the IRS.

It seems we westerners rather tax small business owners and highly paid professionals instead of actual billionaires.

[–] swiftcasty@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

IRS leaders said they collected $38 million in delinquent taxes from more than 175 high-income taxpayers in the past few months.

In one case, an individual had used money owed to the government to buy a Maserati and a Bentley, and roughly 100 high-income people tried to get favorable tax treatment through Puerto Rico without meeting certain tax requirements. Many of those cases are expected to face criminal investigation.

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I hope they roll at least half of the $38M into more enforcement efforts. Hire more agents, investigate more tax cheats, hire more agents.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

That would be like having the police funding themselves with inconceivable from tickets and eventually bite everyone in the ass.

Funding should absolutely increase, but should not be tied to the amount recovered.

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Nope just one more weapon of war.

[–] fosiacat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

thank god, that’s another missile

[–] giddy@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did Cards Against Humanity design their cards based upon the IRS signs or was it the other way around?

[–] gramathy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Oh good I’m not the only one who immediately thought that

[–] cakeistheanswer@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Drops in a bucket.

The sad reality is your average tax cheat will fight tooth and nail for every penny. Because even if right up to 99.9% is clawed bank, it's all profit. Somehow it's still hard to sell the right on having refs powerful enough to police the game.

Edit: stray word

It's a start. Next do churches.

load more comments
view more: next ›