this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10663 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shawdow194@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

"... But it worked. We had lots of margin on that main chute."

Love NASA over engineering

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"In the design plans for the system, the word 'main' was used inconsistently between the device that sends the electric signals, and the device that receives the signals," NASA said in a written statement. "On the signal side, 'main' meant the main parachute. In contrast, on the receiver side 'main' was used as a reference to a pyrotechnic that fires to release the parachute canister cover and deploy the drogue.

"Engineers connected the two mains, causing the parachute deployment actions to occur out of order," NASA said.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I used to work as a technical writer and I always got shat on by engineers who worked along the lines of "real men don't write documentation". But those guys won't read this because reading is just too hard for them.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I guess I’m not a real man. I read documentation as a hobby. Started with Legos, and now it’s reading component i2s communication tables…

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

I'm not saying all engineers are like that. I've met a few capable ones. But the mediocre and less than mediocre ones usually have the biggest chips on their shoulders.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Why wasn't this tested?

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Thade780@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Like when I forget landing legs and the ship is ready to ~~vaporize~~ ~~explode~~ ~~smash into debris~~ lithobrake.

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

lithobrake

Brilliant word, thanks for using it.

[–] silencioso@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It always fascinated me how, something apparently as simple as a parachute, is so hard to do well. We can operate a fucking drone flying repeatedly on the surface of other planet but we struggle to open a piece of cloth.

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Metal and plastic is easy, controlling cloth is hard