this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
256 points (92.4% liked)

News

32940 readers
2624 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In January, a 23-year-old woman sat in Phoenix Municipal Court listening to a prosecutor lay out the evidence against her. On the night of her arrest, she was scantily dressed, the prosecutor told the judge. She also had condoms in her purse and got into a car with a man.

In Phoenix, that was enough to charge her with a crime.

“Given the way the defendant was dressed, as well as a statement as to a date, and her getting in the vehicle with this witness — there is evidence of manifesting prostitution," a prosecutor told Municipal Court Judge Alex Navidad.

Or, more specifically, “manifesting an intent to commit or solicit an act of prostitution.” An obscure city ordinance in Phoenix makes this act a crime with a mandatory sentence of at least 15 days in jail.

The woman, whose name Phoenix New Times is withholding to protect her privacy, is one of more than 450 people in Phoenix who have been charged with manifestation of prostitution over the past eight years. The ordinance, which has been called unconstitutional by the ACLU of Arizona, allows the act of flagging down a car or wearing provocative clothing to be used as grounds to cite someone.

In 2014, the city’s prosecution of Monica Jones under the ordinance drew national outcry. Civil rights organizations condemned the arrest of Jones, a transgender activist and social work student. Even celebrities spoke out against the city’s use of the law.

But Phoenix has not stopped using the ordinance, according to data obtained by New Times.

A review of the data showed that hundreds of people — including 90 in 2022 — have been charged with manifesting prostitution since Jones' case. Over the last two years, the majority of those charged were Black

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pancakesyrupyum@kbin.social 61 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s Phoenix. She’s lucky the cops didn’t execute her on the spot.

Y’all remember that time they did that? I remember.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The time? It's only happened once? I remember it a bit differently.

[–] pancakesyrupyum@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago

Wait, you’re telling me police officers in Phoenix have executed a random person more than once?

Next you’re going to tell me they’ve recently kept slaves in air-conditionless tents in one of the hottest counties in the country.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

I believe that the totalitarian government in Iran also polices dress codes.

[–] BeardedPip@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We REALLY need to decriminalize and destigmatize sex work. Society has not collapse after pot and gambling legalization. All of us will be better off with sex work being just a part of the world.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I agree but I don't want it near my home.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

On this logic, I'm looking forward to laws that criminalize buying firearms because they "manifest an intent to commit murder".

Checkmate, SCOTUS!

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago

Too bad they have the ultimate checkmate of being able to decide the law means whatever that want it to mean.

[–] kingthrillgore@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago

Real theocracy o'clock hours

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sexy with intent to fuck is a crime now?

That makes me like Pablo Escobar.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That makes me the gang that couldn't shot straight

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Seems like a free speech issue to me if you can be charged for wearing the wrong thing. The Supreme Court has determined that clothing can be speech for first amendment purposes.

[–] phamanhvu01@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I thought I'd never say this, but America is looking really like a third-world country lately. Of course that's too much of a generalization, but shit like this, and school shootings, and etc etc...makes you really wondering if you get what I mean.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get we have problems, but holy shit. Stop saying this.

We are not a third world country, and someone even comparing us to one just shows they've never been to a 3rd world country, outside of maybe an enclosed resort.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know 3rd world countries aren't all alike, right? I've been to one—not even in a touristy area—and it was fine.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And which country was this?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Dinodicchellathicc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mexico isn't a third world country. They're developed and have a very solid economy.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 2 years ago

Sounds like you don't know what a third world country is.

[–] Bucket_of_Truth@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago
[–] Scrumpletin@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Always be carrying filming equipment and release forms apparently.

load more comments
view more: next ›