this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
318 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

72137 readers
2765 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 306 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Samsung has decreased its output by 50% since September, though the market has already seen price bumps due to inventory being cleared out.

So they artificially create a shortage to hike up the prices. Nice.

[–] Retiring@lemmy.ml 97 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s capitalism for you 😉

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, capitalism will always choose the most efficient path to acquiring capital, which is evidently acquisition + mergers until they can artificially limit supply, then exploit and extort society wholesale; regardless of the consequences.

Yep… Doesn’t matter if the answer is war, famine, mass incarceration, crippling debt, homelessness, mental illness, pollution, climate change, ecocide, or genocide — capitalists will always find the most efficient path to the acquisition of capital.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The only higher Return On Investment than creating yourself or finding and securinb a monopoly position and squeezing costumers is, maybe, buying politicians and having laws written to favour you, so naturally people guided only by the personal upside maximization idology will engage in both if they think they can get away withnit (or the penalties if caught are less than the profits).

It is absolutelly natural in Capitalism for companies to seek and even create monopoly positions and then squeeze customers, and to corrupt those who make the laws and regulations as well as those who enforce them, and often these things are combined: notice for example how the artifical monopoly which is Copyright has been repeatedly extended in duration to well beyond the point were there is an upside for Society, and now none of us will ever see the works created during our lifetime become Public Works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

To be fair they did far over produce them which is why they’ve been so dirt cheap lately.

But companies did learn over Covid that if you just don’t make something you can charge whatever you want for it and people will pay it.

[–] akrot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

There are plenty of other players on the SSD marker. Crucial, WD, etc. I predict that their prediction will be wrong

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 216 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Spreading rumors of price hikes, to justify later price hikes and quell customer outrage over it.

Capitalism 101.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (5 children)

They all cut way back on manufacturing last year due to the price drops from significantly reduced demand. So it's 100% expected that prices will go up because they've created a reduced supply.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s like there is a SSD OPEC.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's an unofficial open for everything these days, food, medicine, computer components, etc... there's a handful of companies that corner the market for everything now and they all are perfectly happy matching supply and pricing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Yep pure market manipulation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 135 points 2 years ago (4 children)

By what magik are they able to “predict” a 50% price increase ?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 124 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Market Manipulation Lvl 1: Hyping

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 years ago

Setting expectations..

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

They plan to raise prices 50%, then they raise prices 50%.

My employer isn't any better. We raised prices on our second biggest product line about 6 months ago.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Article says SSD manufacturers currently sell at a loss & intend to raise prices because they want to be profitable, 40% is break even, 50% is profitable

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

Then the journalist who wrote the article is absolutely lying to us.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Selling at a loss? Lol yeah sure they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Maybe they should cut the executive class salaries. Bet there is plenty of money there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jezebelley3d@lemmy.zip 135 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fake problems in order to get in on all this fake inflation bullshit. All these capitalist pigs raking people over the coals for record profits under the entirely fabricated "inflation" crisis. SSD manufacturers want to get theirs too.

This is the prep/hype phase where they spread fake news to get the consumers prepped for surgery. None of it is real.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 65 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well that's not great... They're already pretty expensive as it is.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (7 children)

yeah i thought 4TB would be like $50 now. whatever happened to moore's law

[–] Lath@kbin.social 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unregulated capitalism some would say, I say cheap production costs with little to no consequence whatsoever for them doing this kind of thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Moore's law has been dead for a long long time.

E: if you're downvoting this it's because you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Moore's law was the observation that transistor density would double every ~2 years. That's not happening and hasn't for a long time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I thought Moore's law was only for CPUs/chip density?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

SSDs are absurdly cheap at the moment. 2023s demand glut led to a huge over abundance of SSDs and dirt cheap prices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago

Greeedflation bullshit

[–] hark@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (17 children)

These companies need to get smacked upside the head. Hard drives would be pretty much completely obsoleted if SSDs hit the prices that they should if we had proper competition instead of the "competition" to keep prices up that this memory cartel loves to keep up. My only hope is for another player to come in and dump cheap product onto the market like Japan did in the 80s.

[–] Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Hdd wont be obsolete for awhile. They're the best media to store large libraries cost effectively. Until there are 10+TB SSDS with reasonable prices, many people with home storage systems won't upgrade. Not shelling out $10k for SSDS, sorry.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's what they said though...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hips_and_nips@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

While I love the thought, I’m not going to hold my breath on replacing my 880 TB of spinning platters with SSDs.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Looks Iike a good year for deleting things.

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

nothing like a little digital Swedish death cleaning to free up space

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Maybe this will encourage devs not to make games over 100GB.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 years ago

Hahahaha! Good joke mate :)

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Sheltac@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago

Glad I just bought a 4tb gen 3 drive for dirt cheap

[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

PC part prices are already extremely high, how in the hell can anyone build or buy anything with prices so high?

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, guess I'm buying that new NVME in January after all...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I wonder if it's gonna be a fire or a flood this year. They always make stuff up to raise it.

load more comments
view more: next ›