Another one to have a search for is IPFS.
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
35 points (92.7% liked)
Selfhosted
48471 readers
361 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
All files stored on IPFS are public. It's also incredibly slow and inefficient. You would be better off using BitTorrent.
Likely not the solution you're looking for but a buddy and i link a folder via syncthing and anything added to one side shows up on the other.
I use synching too, but it's not what I'm looking for here.
Ceph, GlusterFS, and I suspect SeaweedFS (but I haven't used it) expect high speed, low latency connections to their peers. So they won't work well over the internet.
There's some info floating around about using IPFS as the backend for Jellyfin, which in theory should allow you to share media between friends, but I haven't tried it.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=PHujBhq4J9A
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Seems to me the easiest solution would be each host a replica. Now that you can get 8TB for something like a hundred bucks this would be both faster and more redundant if one would fail
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
| Fewer Letters | More Letters |
|---|---|
| Git | Popular version control system, primarily for code |
| IP | Internet Protocol |
| Plex | Brand of media server package |
| VPN | Virtual Private Network |
4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 6 acronyms.
[Thread #399 for this sub, first seen 4th Jan 2024, 03:05] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]
What's the cumbersome part?
VPN? Mesh overlay VPN like tailscale/nebula mesh can do easy node add.
IPFS nodes might do the trick as mentioned.
On each node, map all the other nodes as smb, and configure all in jellyfin.
It would be nicer to have one single mount.
What about using symlinks?
You creat a directory /media. Mount shares there. Your media application scans /media and just finds media files.
Still sucks because you have to mount each repo, /media/person1/movies, etc
But you don't have to reconfigure media app anymore.
I don't know what a pooled remote file system like what you're wanting.
Why do you use SMB instead of just connecting to the different jellyfin servers directly via VPN?
One big shared media volume has multiple benefits, each server just have to deal with their own user management, no server switching or remembering if that one movie is of this or that Server....
Could you use symlinks? Not sure what the "gotchas" or downside to this approach is though.
Downside: it's entirety manual and not scalable whatsoever.
Could you explain further? Wouldn't this just need to be setup once per server that OP wants to connect?
I use Plex instead of jellyfin, but there's the ability to just add a friends library and it pulls in without mounting anything. I thought Jellydin had that as well?
plex uses a centralized service for this kinda of nonsense. most of us are using standalone server products.
this use case calls for either centralized storage (s3 bucket) or access mechanism(all them vpns) to distributed channels (ala plex)... but friends dont let friends use plex.
im curious about ipfs as distributed file systems sound like a new kink i should have
tell me why i shouldn't use plex as I'm always tempted by it whenever these threads come up and everyone who uses it is so happy.
But free/libre is so much more delicious.
But don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.