scrubbles

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF

My primary worry too there. While being under a giant publisher isn't a good thing, we did get games like Satisfactory and DRG. Messing with the formula at all right now is risky

What? They're on their own now, not owned by embracer. We have no idea if this will be good or bad from them. There are pros and cons right now, but I thought most people would be happy they're out from under Embracer

I decided when the show was on that I'd love to buy and read the books, when they're finished. We're over a decade past that and still haven't bothered to even crack open the first. Doubt I ever will

Yup, Embracer owns a lot actually, so I'm leaning it's good CSS will be it's own

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Ah thank you, even the article didn't say that clearly. That's better, I'd be sad if it was not Coffeestain anymore, but still a bit nervous

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Could mean a few things. Embracer has never really been the good guy of video game publishers, so maybe it frees Coffee Stain up to do more interesting projects that maybe Embracer would have said no to. Maybe they don't have a lot of hope for Coffee Stain and want to separate it. I think it's too early to know for sure

Yup I feel that hard. Like they would actually care for the children at all, they want grandma/grandpa duty, to come over, have fun grandkid time and then leave as soon as the kids get fussy, or poop, or anything they don't like. For my mom, she has friends that she's jealous of and now wants grandkids just so she can show her friends. All horrible reasons.

And yeah, my dad was similar, to the point where he thought he was hurting me by taking me out of his will. Literally said "You're out of the will!". The guy was a low level government worker, he has an okay pension but his salary was less than 50k for the vast majority of his life. Owns no property or anything. I think I'll live not being in it lol

 

Not sure if I'm happy or worried about this

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

For me, it wasn't trauma in the standard sense, but my mother was horrible with money. Like she took out against her retirement, spent it all, never saved a dime in her life. We grew up in poverty because of it. The kicker is that while we were tight for money, she was honestly just really bad with it. We could have done fine, she had a decent paying corporate job for most of my childhood, but she's just buy things that nobody needs. "I found these random things at a garage sale, only $200!" "But we don't need those at all, what are we going to do with them?" "I don't know they just looked great!" She emptied her retirement to do a home improvement project that was 100% cosmetic. She constantly borrowed money from family, and she had my siblings and I call family to ask them to borrow money.

So, I'm doing fairly well now, and it's looking like I'll have to carry her financial burden going forward. We're talking probably thousands a month for her.

None of that stopped her from starting to casually drop that she wants grandkids. None of this clicks for her. I think the (US) national average cost for a kid just passed 800 thousand. For each kid. I'm sure it goes down a bit, handmedowns and what not, but that's also the average cost.

Ffs, she knows I'll need to already spend thousands a month just on her, and then has the audacity to be upset that I don't want kids? It's just. A lot. It's annoying and it's a lot.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Idk, I've heard things about HooliChat... Didn't their stream go down in the middle of a big title fight?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I was going to say, wait another reboot?

Little Randy, Lucy and Bo-bandy's kid. What happened to little random? They covered the story by saying they put the little maf up for adoption, but other than that the little cheeseburger driving kid was never spoken of again.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So they have rounds of layoffs, staff feel less secure in their role, and they're surprised that knowledgeable and easily employable experts are leaving for more stable roles?

 

cross-posted from: https://poptalk.scrubbles.tech/post/2333639

I was just forwarded this someone in my household who watches our server. That's it folks. I've been a hold out for a long time, but this is honestly it.

They want me to pay to stream content that I bought from my hardware transcoded also on my hardware.

I'll say it. As of today, I say Plex is dead. Luckily I've been setting up Jellyfin, I guess it's time to make it production ready.

Edit: I have a Plex Pass. More comments saying “Just buy a plex pass” are seriously not getting it. I have a Plex Pass and my users are still getting this.

And for the thousandth person who wants to say the same things to me:

  • YES I know I'm unaffected as a Plex Pass owner.
  • My users were immediately angry at it, which made me angry. Our users don't understand what plex pass is, and they shouldn't have to, that's why I had it. The fact that they were pinged even though it should have kept working is horribly sloppy
  • Plex is still removing functionality. I don't care that "People should pay their fair share". If Plex wants to put every new feature behind a paywall, that's completely okay. They are removing functionality.
    • "But they have cloud costs". Remote streaming is negligible to them. It's a dynamic DNS service. Plex client logs in, asks where server is, plex cloud responds with the IP and port of where server is located. That's it.
    • "Good luck finding another remote streaming" - Again, Plex just opens up an IP and port. Jellyfin also just opens up an IP and port (Hold on jellyfin folks I know, security, that's a separate conversation). All "remote streaming" is is their dynamic dns. Literal pennies to them. Know what actually is costing them money? Hosting all of that ad-supported "free" content that they're probably losing money on.

In short, I don't care how you justify it. Plex is doing something shitty. They're removing functionality that has been free for years. I'm not responding to any more of your comments repeating the same arguments over and over.

 

I was just forwarded this someone in my household who watches our server. That's it folks. I've been a hold out for a long time, but this is honestly it.

They want me to pay to stream content that I bought from my hardware transcoded also on my hardware.

I'll say it. As of today, I say Plex is dead. Luckily I've been setting up Jellyfin, I guess it's time to make it production ready.

Edit I have a Plex Pass. More comments saying "Just buy a plex pass" are seriously not getting it. I have a Plex Pass and my users are still getting this.

 

Hi folks. So, I know due to a myriad of reasons I should not allow Jellyfin access to the open internet. However, in trying to switch family over from Plex, I'll need something that "just works".

How are people solving this problem? I've thought about a few solutions, like whitelisting ips (which can change of course), or setting up VPN or tail scale (but then that is more work than they will be willing to do on their side). I can even add some level of auth into my reverse proxy, but that would break Jellyfin clients.

Wondering what others have thought about for this problem

 

Heads up for those who run a dedicated server who haven't tried experimental first, posting this so it's on your radar.

Long story short, we had to open two additional ports on our server, 8888 and 27777. Following is a direct copy from the changelog:

Dedicated Server - Port Forwarding Updates

If you have Host a dedicated server, you should definitely give the next block a read as many new improvements have been added to allow for extra flexibility since the last update on Experimental

We have updated the Port Allocation Strategy in Reliable Messaging New features:

Explicit Port Configuration

  • A new -ReliablePort= command-line parameter allows explicit port selection.
  • The value must be an integer between 0 and 65535.
  • If specified, the server will attempt to bind to this port and fail to initialize if the port is unavailable.

Default and Configurable Port Ranges The following settings in Engine.ini control port allocation:

[/Script/ReliableMessaging.ReliableMessagingTCPFactory]
PortRangeBegin=8888
PortRangeLength=512
ExternalPortRangeBegin=-1
  • The server will attempt to bind within [PortRangeBegin, PortRangeBegin + PortRangeLength).
  • By default, the server starts at port 8888 and tries up to 512 ports until it finds an available one.

Client Awareness & NAT Handling

  • Clients must connect to the correct port, but port remapping (e.g., via NAT/firewall rules) can break this.
  • To address this, the server now communicates the listening port to clients during the initial handshake.
  • If external port remapping is used, the server must be aware of the external port via:
  • The ExternalPortRangeBegin config setting (for remapped ranges).
  • The -ExternalReliablePort= command-line parameter (for explicitly mapped ports).

Server Host Requirements (TL;DR)

  • If hosting a single server, port 8888 TCP must be open by default.
  • If hosting multiple servers, a range of ports starting from 8888 TCP (by default) must be open.
  • The server will attempt up to 512 ports before failing (configurable).
  • If port remapping (NAT/firewall) is used, the server must be configured accordingly; otherwise, clients won’t be able to connect.
  • Logging is in place to help server maintainers verify the allocated ports.
 

Hi folks, title essentially. I'm using Open Razer and Polychromatic on PopOS right now for my keyboard, but I have a few other peripherals that are also RGB. A corsair cooler, my EVGA card, and my Gigabyte mobo lighting. I was wondering if there's a single pane I can organize them all with. I don't have super high expectations, but maybe there's something out there. Thanks!

 

I am someone who always enjoys having something on in the background, helping me focus.

I love me some Andor, GoT, a lot of newer stuff that is made with really high production quality - but I sit down to watch those.

What shows do you watch that just sit running in the background, ones that aren't going to win any Emmys but you just enjoy?

For me my last two are Home Improvement and Everybody Loves Raymond. Both were fine in their heyday, but now they are noise filler. Not terrible, not great. So what are yours?

 

Maybe an ivory backscratcher?

view more: next ›