this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
61 points (77.5% liked)

World News

50583 readers
1304 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Who gives a fuck? We are destroying our greatest political rival for pennies on the dollar.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean it's 1 billion dollars of military equipment. Probably don't want that falling into the wrong hands.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

That's just spare change for the Pentagon. Almost a rounding error when it comes to unaccounted for money in their audits.

This time around, 1,600 auditors combed through DOD’s $3.8 trillion in assets and $4 trillion in liabilities, conducting some 700 site visits. They found that half of DOD’s assets can’t be accounted for.
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4313887-pentagon-fails-sixth-audit-in-a-row/

Second greatest after each other but it's close.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure Russia only comes in second on that list (after China), but you're right about the rest of it.

[–] jonne -4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, totally not a problem to have fascist groups armed with military gear running around in Europe. It was so much fun when that happened in the 80s.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

We didn't give it directly to Ukraine, which is why this is happening.

A bunch of countries were donating equipment through the same few routes thru the same countries.

Even if it was cataloged and documented properly, it takes time to go all thru the chain all the way to the end and hear back. Especially since all the countries are probably asking.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Hmmmm... where have I heard this before? 🤔

Oh! Right!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/feb/08/usa.iraq1

"The US flew nearly $12bn in shrink-wrapped $100 bills into Iraq, then distributed the cash with no proper control over who was receiving it and how it was being spent.

. . .

In the year after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 nearly 281 million notes, weighing 363 tonnes, were sent from New York to Baghdad for disbursement to Iraqi ministries and US contractors. Using C-130 planes, the deliveries took place once or twice a month with the biggest of $2,401,600,000 on June 22 2004, six days before the handover."

It's almost like the people in charge of this kind of thing REALLY should not be in charge of this kind of thing...

[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

That's peanuts compared to what they "lost" in Afghanistan and Iraq.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — Shortfalls in required monitoring by American officials mean the U.S. cannot track more than $1 billion in weapons and military equipment provided to Ukraine to fight invading Russian forces, according to a Pentagon audit released Thursday.

Citing what he said was Russian disinformation to the contrary, Ryder added, “The fact is, we observed the Ukrainians employing these capabilities on the battlefield.

House Republican opposition for months has stalled Biden’s request to Congress for $105 billion more for Ukraine, Israel and other national security objectives.

National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said Thursday that there was no funding left for additional military aid packages to Ukraine.

The U.S. has provided tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine, including big systems such as air defense.

Kirby said administration officials “has for many months now been interested in improving accountability over the end use of material that is provided to Ukraine.”


The original article contains 531 words, the summary contains 154 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Meaning they didn't count each and every weapon fired and record exactly which Russian it hit.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm sure sloppily executed arms proliferation has never come back to bite the US in it's ass, no biggie. At least we we're sending them to the reasonable side this time.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This isn't arms proliferation, this is providing support for a country defending itself from invasion.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If it's not accounted for it's exactly proliferation, it just ended up somewhere less horrible than usual, maybe anyway, we don't know.