this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
179 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

73287 readers
3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple to Remove Blood-Oxygen Sensor From Watch to Avoid U.S. Ban::Tech giant’s withdrawal of technology may end cloud hanging over $18 billion smartwatch business

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

A decision on Apple’s request for a permanent stay on the U.S. ban during its appeal is expected in the coming days.

An Apple spokeswoman said that the blood-oxygen feature would continue to be available on the watches for now.

Still at the maybe maybe maybe stage.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Based on the article and other comments about the dispute, it seems like a justified legal move, but I hope they come around to an agreement regarding existing devices, rather than something insane, such as disabling the functionality on existing consumer devices.

I was given an Apple Watch in 2017. I replaced that (functioning just fine) watch about a year ago with a model with a pulse oximeter, specifically because I wanted the feature.

[–] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

“What should we do? Just PAY the developer for the feature? Nah, we’ll just continue to file lawsuits and eventually settle in the inevitable class action from buyers which will certainly not be more than what we would have spent just licensing it in the first place”

Look, I’m not one for patent trolling, but this is pretty blatant on Apple’s end and as a Series 9 owner it’s annoying because it’s a feature I upgraded for that I’ll lose access to just because they don’t want to be told they’re wrong. Such corporate bullshit.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They couldn’t do that without somehow compensating you. Not saying that is better but they can’t cripple a product that you have paid for.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That will end up as a class action lawsuit with some merit. There will be a race to file this one.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago

Won’t get much back though. It’ll be a small refund based on the cost of the feature relative to the overall purchase price.

[–] saywhatisabigw@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

What about all the customers who bought it for that feature?

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Paywall Bypass is less work than the comment :)

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fr, wish OP would just post the paywall bypass link

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago

They're typically extensions to avoid the paywall w/ JS.

I'm not going to archive the websites most of us can view w/o any issues.

[–] Swiftxx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Click link, view article.