this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
341 points (84.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7208 readers
814 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 189 points 1 year ago (7 children)

sniff sniff

You smell that? They're coming, the ISO 8601 gang.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 152 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Easily proved to be the best: in every time travel story, the time traveler asks for the date. The unsuspecting drone always responds with DD or MM-DD, and the protagonist has to shout at them “NO! WHAT YEAR IS IT?”

Always start with YYYY.

I rest my case.

Gotta have that good sorting

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago

Anything else is madness. It’s demonstrably the only logical answer.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DD is day in year, I think dd is what you mean. Also, YYYY is week year, so better to use yyyy.

yyyy-MM-dd

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmydripzdotz123@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

W E A R E I N E V I T A B L E

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago
[–] JPJones@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

You're god damn right

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Hell yeah, brother!

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] melooone@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I prefer RFC 3339. It allows you to omit the "T" for example. Like this: 1985-04-12 23:20:50Z

[–] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

Either is preferable to the abomination in the meme.

[–] gornius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Imo, the more strict the format the better. Less ambiguity == less confusing when it doesn't work and easier parser to write.

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Today is 2024, January 24.

It looks perfect. Although my only concern is if we should use the preposition "in" (since the year comes first: "in 2024") or "on" (because we say "on January 24").

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's great when organizing something in a database. You can just do A to Z ordering and it works just fine.

However visually it's not very good because it puts the least important piece of information first and the most important piece of information last. I probably know the current year so it doesn't need to be that prominent, and I'm fairly certain that it's going to be sometime this millennium, so I don't need the date to four digits.

[–] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's entirely depend on the time frame range of your data. If it's wide it rapidly becomes useful to see the year first. In general I like to put 'larger' group variables in tables from left to right, helps in a similar way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mathematicalMagpie@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Always write largest to smallest. That way it can be sorted easily starting with the year, then month, then day.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or as computer people say, big-endian.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

We should all just write it in ISO 8601

[–] PR3CiSiON@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Largest to smallest? So should I write December 02, 2024 as 2024/12/02? And then February 12, 2024 as 2024/12/02?

/s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

I bet you write your time as ss:mm:hh you silly little guy, you small to large clown you. Break up with him babe, you can do better

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

2/2/0/3/0/1/2/4 <- Today's date in this obnoxious format

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Pure beauty.

[–] example@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

looks better when you remove the slashes

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Curious why you didn’t go for DYMYDYMY.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine not using milliseconds since Jan 1 1970 GMT

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BoisZoi@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

Bill Shats. Master and Commander of the Deathstar Galactica.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's add more granularity, like hours and minutes:

MM:HH DD/MM/YYYY

wait...

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Little-endian number formats are the only way to go in the year 4202.

[–] venoft@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Back in the 2000's it was way more confusing. The appointment is on 10/09/11, when the hell is that?

[–] ammonium@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

11 am on the 10th of '09. Month, millennium, century and month are free to choose by the reader.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jessca@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

TIL that I am a member of a gang.

The ISO 8601 gang.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YYYY-MM-DD everything else is wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rsh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Logical? So if we use the same logic for money, that big mac will be $17.5

load more comments
view more: next ›