this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
690 points (96.9% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 105 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is an interesting sabotage to any figures that want to maintain their presence.

If you search for "brandname twitter", you're probably going to get what you want. "brandname x" will be a SEO catastrophe.

Maybe they hoped to drive people to navigate through their own site and search facilities, but generally, not being where people are looking is a terrible strategy even on a chain of bad strategies.

[–] beta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Corporations just seem to be getting more and more abstract... Here's my ✨ amazing ✨ (non-complete) list:

  • Oversimplification of logos (*cough* *cough* Firefox killing our fox)
  • Corporate Memphis (that big tech, supper flat, indestiguishable art style)
  • Websites (everything is either a bento box, image carousel, or loaded up with scroll-based animations -- or all of these)
  • Names (Facebook is now Meta, Twitter is becoming X)
[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Firefox still has the fox:

[–] Micromot@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think he mistakenly referred to the firefox group of things like the password manager, the browser still has the fox logo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Finnbot@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Corporate Memphis is just the worst. I dunno why but it gives me heavy dystopian connotations.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

It kooks like children were forced to design corporate logos in ms paint.

[–] lukini@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The google redesign was the worst. I still haven't gotten used to it and doubt I ever will.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Becoming_X

Appropriate that this album is from the late 90s, which is when the X name would have actually been cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] berkersal@iusearchlinux.fyi 17 points 2 years ago

A brand that limits users on how many content they can see wouldn't want them to use their search engine when there is a free one that does it better

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 48 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If X is no longer twitter, how long till the copyright on the twitter brand expires?

You can't argue anyone would confuse a website called twitter with 'X'.

Maybe Zuckerberg could rebrand threads Twitter.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 years ago

That would genuinely be funny, I'm all for it

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trademark not copyright. Copyright only applies to entire works like a song text or the code Twitter has produced. For example the song title alone is not copyrighted. A trademark realistically only expires when it gets contested in court.

[–] Onionizer@geddit.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is there a law that you must use a trademark to keep it?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's a similar law where you must at least defend a trademark against misuse to keep hold of it. That was the reasoning behind this music video for Velcro:

https://youtu.be/rRi8LptvFZY

So, based on that, maybe they won't lose it just by not using it. But if someone else tried to establish a Twitter product, they may lose the trademark if they don't fight it.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/rRi8LptvFZY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System see logo and name in case not familiar with the context

[–] BluDood@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I love how the X wm came from the W wm which was in the V OS

[–] rDrDr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I honestly think it is close enough to the x.org logo to be a trademark suit.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago

Just from an economic standpoint, it's such a terrible decision. The Twitter bird is iconic to the point where the trademark itself is worth a considerable amount. This is like Disney dumping Mickey Mouse for a side character in The Dark Cauldron.

[–] Supermuff@feddit.de 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

𝕎𝕆𝕎, 𝕊𝕌𝕔𝕙 𝔸𝕟 𝔼𝕏𝕔𝕀𝕋𝕀𝕟𝔾 𝔸𝕟𝔻 𝕔𝕣𝔼𝔸𝕋𝕀𝕍𝔼 𝕀𝕔𝕆𝕟

𝕏

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago

RIP people searching google for help with "X" on Windows.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  • Bland corporations and mediocre CEO when they need to name something * Slaps an X on it *

A guy made wayland social to prove superiority lmao

[–] HerrBoedefeld@feddit.de 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh no, i love the x-com games. They don't deserve to be the name sponsor for Elons weird platform.

[–] BlazeMaster3000@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think he is referring to the X-Men and Wolverine don't deserve to be the name sponsor for Elon's perverted platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hayek@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago

Can’t wait for the first X on X by X Æ A-12 about the SpaceX launch

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sometimes I wonder if the Claudian letters stuck and, just like we got X for /ks/ (or /gz/... or /ʃ/... or whatever, this letter is a mess), we also got a Ↄ for /ps/. Maybe modern people would be also spamming Ↄ for this sort of "rule of cool"?

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When I first read this post, I thought the CSS had gone wonky and part of the O was cut off.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

·puᴉɯ ou ʎɐꓒ ·ǝnɓoɹ sǝoɓ SSꓛ ǝɥʇ sǝɯᴉʇǝɯoS

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago
[–] eldain@feddit.nl 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Classic Elon, will tweeting be called sexting and is this the main reason for the name change?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] friedtofu@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Musk's gon' bill it to ya

Tired of tweeting for free? X's gonna monetize ya

Tap tap, open up the app, it's ~~free~~...

With the non-stop, cash grab of premium fees

Riding rockets, now he's starbound and sold

But he got such a grand scheme

That'll make a tweeter wonder if he’s been memed

Damn right, and he'll charge you again, 'cause he's Elon, so hes gots to win

Tweet battles with the freemium, but no matter how many cats he boxes with, he'll profit on your scene and win

[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I honestly wonder if this is going to end up forcing the X graphics system to rename itself based on trademark law.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago

I doubt it. They don't compete and X has preceded Elon's rebrand by decades.

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

XBox brand in shambles.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

"χ"... A most ancient letter. Some say "kye," but the meaning is the same. Death... A letter that spells endings

[–] neopenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm thinking Elon doing this crazy rename is a throwback

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.com

[–] weedazz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Sad thing will be he's probably somehow going to make SpaceX part of this

[–] TurtleLife@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Elon is breaking up with his X and starting anew

[–] MasterNerd@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

This is such a bad move just from an SEO perspectiv

[–] VirtualAlias@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He's kicking into x.ai. There are good reasons to think that he bought Twitter to use its massive data-set of human language to train an ai - NOT because he gave/gives a shit about Twitter as a profitable company.

If it becomes a paid competitor to OpenAI, it solves its profitability issues without enhancing "Twitter" as a social media site. Anything he said about improving Twitter was likely a lie designed to prolong usage of the platform and enhance the dataset.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why did he have to buy Twitter to get the tweet data? Isn't it all publicly visible? (Seriously asking)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would you think access to Twitter users nonsense is in any way an improvement over existing training data let alone enough make spending tens of billions for Twitter a good deal. He bought it because he said stupid shit and when he thought he could back out they were suing him to uphold the deal he made to buy it and they were going to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›