this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
767 points (95.6% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elrik@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Can someone provide some context here? Why is he screaming at a coach?

Also side note: why is that even vaguely tolerable behavior for a professional sports player / role model?

[–] droans@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

He had one target for one yard in the first half. Travis Kelce is the best TE currently in the NFL and considered to be the third best ever to play the game.

Since all the receivers for the Chiefs are mid at best this year, he's got some reason to be pissed. One of them, Kadarius Toney, was put on the gameday injury report for the AFCCG as being out for a leg injury and "personal reasons". He then went public saying his leg was perfectly fine and he had no personal reasons to skip the game... Basically clarifying that the actual reason he wasn't playing was because he's ass.

But Travis Kelce was also being guarded by Fred Warner during the first half who is one of the best linebackers in NFL history.

It could be a diva moment, sure. But it's the Super Bowl. Good teams know that you trust your studs. Romo would throw to Dez in double or triple team coverage, knowing he'd come down with it. Peyton Manning would chuck it at Marvin Harrison no matter who was on him. When someone is that good, all you've got to do is get the ball in their vicinity. Either they'll come down with it or they'll keep the defenders from getting it.

It's still stupid to yell at your coach like that and physically push him, but Andy Reid was making a lot of boneheaded decisions in the first. They went into halftime down 10-3. They did change things up during the second half, though. Kelce ended up with 9 receptions for 93 yards while the Chiefs won 25-22 in OT.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I understood nothing. But I feel like you know what you are talking about. I heard about that Payton guy.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds very unsportsmanlike. He is better than everyone so gets mad when he doesn't always get to play?!? That's not ok. That's real loser behavior.

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Its not a participation award game. It's the game of games. It's not about kelce not getting to play. It's about the chiefs losing because they're not utilizing their best weapon. It's a team sport and you're watching your team lose because you're not being used.

Imagine being on a competitive team project and you're the best speaker presenting to the state but your teacher decides to let the shy kids try to present, clearly bumbling and being incoherent, letting your opponents out argue every point your peers are making when you clearly can out speak them. You'd be pretty upset with your teacher for getting you to states, you being the reason you're there, and then once you're there you're sidelined.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe the coach knows better than the player though.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree on his decision. Yeah they were down a touchdown and extra point at the end of the first half, but the 49ers tired themselves out while Kelcey was just getting started.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Eh, sitting through Packers games during the McCarthy years, I wouldn't assume that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

why is that even vaguely tolerable behavior for a professional sports player / role model?

From what I’ve seen over the years acting like a complete dick head is just part of the sport.

They are over paid Neanderthals for the most part.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The chiefs fumbled, and that guy thought he should have been in, so they wouldn't have lost the ball. I believe that he is screaming, "just leave me in the game" like every play.

Why it's tolerated, not sure.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cause he's one of the best tight ends to ever play the game. Might be addressed in the off-season though.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let's hope he doesn't Icarus the fuck out. It wasn't even close to his best season. The chiefs are doing this whole villains thing anyway. Maybe it gets them three in a row but I know if you even if you're just pretending to be a villian you start looking at yourself that way. It's just not sustainable.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Nah, the screaming is uncalled for no matter who you are. I don't care how many sports he balled.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

He brings in an enormous amount of money for the team and league. Make enough money and you can treat whoever you want, however you want. It's not morally right, but it's true.

[–] kiku123@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

It's tolerated because he's literally the best player in his position in the entire world (and one of the best in the history of the entire sport). What are the going to do? Get rid of him?

If you're not one of the best, the behavior is not tolerated as much.

Why it’s tolerated, not sure.

Andy Reid tolerated it because he knows that the violent psychopaths playing for him are hopped up on a variety of drugs and need to be cut a little slack.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 007ace@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised. I've only seen Taylor 3x now. I was expecting more.

[–] radiohead37@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

KC isn’t doing great. Not many opportunities to show her celebrating.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is the game worth tuning into? I maybe catch 2-3 games a season but I almost never watch the super bowl any more because its like, never a good exciting, close game.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It was a fucking nail biter!

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

KC just tied it, so the last few minutes might be worth it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Though plenty would disagree I'm sure, I'd say it was one of the best Superbowls ever. Both defensive squads played their hearts out and the game was 75 minutes of back and forth scrambling. Kind of sad that Mahomes won the MVP, he had a pretty meh game (by his normal standards). It was their defense that deserves credit for the win, hell even Butker more so than Mahomes. The fact that they broke the old field goal distance record three times in this one game is crazy.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

yeah I caughttheast 5 minutes and the over time. Very exciting game. def the best super bowl I've ever seen, at least since Pats Seattle when Seattle blew it.

[–] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Overtime now, wild game really!

[–] Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, neither team is playing well tonight, but the chiefs have just been off form all game except the 4th quarter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She'd just buy the whole team and make his life miserable

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A billion dollars net worth is not rich enough to buy a Superbowl champion NFL team. Not even close to enough.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not enough to buy Bortles Era Jacksonville Jags, much less now when they are somehow much worse.

[–] MadBabs@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 35 points 1 year ago

Sometimes, when I have a problem, I throw a Molotov cocktail. After that, I have a completely different problem!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree about your point, but their point was if they lost.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's still not rich enough to buy the worst team in the NFL. You'd still need about $5-6B just to get interest.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do teams get into the NFL? Could she buy a non-nfl team and bring it up to NFL standards and then win the Superbowl with it? I'm not asking if it's realistic, just, you know, curious if it could be attempted like rich guys do in soccer

[–] droans@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They haven't had an expansion franchise since 2002 and it's unlikely it'll happen any time in the near future. 32 teams is perfectly balanced - each conference has 16 teams and four divisions. Each division has four teams.

It would also be very expensive.

You'd need a stadium that met the NFL standards. The average stadium costs about $2B. Fortunately for her (and unfortunately for the rest of us), taxpayers on average pay about $1.2B of that. We'll be very generous and assume they paid even more or she received a substantial loan that will be paid off otherwise, leaving her with about $250M out of pocket.

It should be noted that the opposite is more often true for expansion teams, though. Cities don't want to pay for the stadium because there's more risk with new teams. They could decide to leave very quickly, the owners might not have the capital to keep the team afloat, etc. The Texans were the last expansion team and nearly all of the cost for their stadium was privately funded.

Now, the NFL also charges a fee for expansion teams. This mostly has to be a guesstimate because we haven't seen one in two decades. The Texans paid $700M at the time so we can assume it would be closer to $1.5B now.

After that, you have the practice facilities and offices. Cities don't usually cover that. You might be able to get away with using local facilities for a couple of years, but that won't be enough to actually create a competitive team. A safe low-end estimate for this would be $150M. The Cowboys paid $1.5B for their facilities, but other teams have paid as low as $125M.

Finally, the last big cost is payroll. This by itself would sink any chance she has.

The NFL requires all guaranteed contracted salaries to be placed in escrow. I'm not sure where that rule came from, but I can probably guess Al Davis is to blame. A single year's salary would be $225M for 2023 and around $240M for next season.

However, most of the big name players have guarantees that would destroy that. The most common is a signing bonus. Teams love them because the salary cap rules would allow them to amortize it over the length of the contract, including "void years". Your QB would receive about $200M immediately upon signing. The expansion draft picks and early draft picks would be another $300-500M likely. In the end, the salary escrow plus bonuses would be about $500M-1B.

So assuming everything goes her way, she'd be on the hook for close to $2.5B immediately plus the reoccurring costs.

It should also be noted that the NFL isn't really a great way to make money as an owner. It's really just a long term retirement hobby for billionaires. They could just go invest in companies or whatever, but they buy NFL teams because they like football and it occupies their time. Yeah, they'll make money, but not as much as they otherwise could. There's a reason most owners hate the idea of a super-billionaire like Bezos owning a team.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dude must absolutely crush it in bed, cuz he looks like a giant red flag otherwise.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago

I was planning on losing, but since you insist...

[–] SternburgExport@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guy on the left looks like a McDonald’s cashier in that outfit.

How dare you? That's Andy Reid - he looks like a Walmart greeter.

[–] insanepotato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder what team is going to pick him up?

load more comments
view more: next ›