this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
50 points (87.9% liked)

politics

23602 readers
2238 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's basically too late, anyway. He would never be able to build the momentum needed to win any primary (Dem or Rep). Plus, he's not really a likeable person, and some level of charisma is necessary to win any political race.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The idea wasn't that he'd run in a primary, but that he would mount a third party 'no labels' bid in the general election. Polling made it really clear that this would throw the general election to Trump as some Biden voters would shift to Manchin, but few Trump voters would.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would also like to end months of speculation by announcing that I won't run for president either.

I'm still writing you in, fucker

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Fuck. Welp, Trump it is then.

/s

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

We had already forgotten that he even existed

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I was wondering if I'd get to post this today. Trump only being banned from doing business in New York for three years didn't cut it. But this works.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Run for president on what platform? Genuinely, was he planning on running against Trump or against Biden?

Because both parties see him as a traitor. To Democrats, he was the lone senator blocking pivotal congressional action for years. To Republicans, he's been sleeping with the enemy and pushed out what would have otherwise been a guaranteed seat in the senate so he could be a "compromise Democrat".

So like.. Who was he going to impress?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He was being courted by the No Labels group. He wasn't going to win against Trump or Biden, but might have siphoned off several percent of voters who would otherwise go for Biden, throwing the election to Trump. Which was the whole point of trying to get him to run.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for the actual answer. I still think that's really stupid though, as you'd have to be a fool to vote for him on his record in congress. I think it's just as likely he'd siphon votes from Trump in that case.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Polling made it clear he'd siphon off two or three times more voters from Biden than Trump.

And yes, some people are foolish and would have voted for him.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sorry, centrists. I know Biden isn't your first choice, but...

The 10 people who would’ve voted for him are very upset