this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
788 points (97.9% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7097 readers
1143 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

FYI, the main innovations of these kite sails compared to traditional sailing ships are that it doesn't need masts that get in the way of cargo handling and that it requires fewer crew. In other words, it's not faster or anything; it's just cheaper.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

You also need vastly less sail area and the things are more reliable because wind gets quite a bit stronger and reliable at 100-300 metres up. The system actually isn't new. AFAIU main reason for it not getting wide-spread adoption is that shipping lines, not ship owners, pay for fuel.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Modern cargo ships are so huge traditional sails wouldn't provide enough force to push them around. Neither will these kites, mind you. But, supplemental energy will still be a bonus, and a kite can reach higher and sit in faster, more stable winds.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Modern cargo ships are so huge traditional sails wouldn’t provide enough force to push them around.

Believe it or not, "proportionality" is a thing. You make the ship bigger, you make the sails bigger to match. Simple! Granted, previously, making sails bigger was limited by the weight of the things when hoisted by men operating manual winches, but now we've got motors now to solve that, and higher strength-to-weight ratio materials, too.

Point is: I maintain that, in principle, you could make a post-Panamax sailing ship -- even a traditional fully-rigged one -- if you really wanted to, and it would be capable of sailing at hull speed on wind power alone. It's just that they don't want to for reasons unrelated to technical feasibility.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're assuming everything scales linearly, which is not necessarily accurate. The square-cube law rains on many people's parades.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see how you'd think that, but I'm really just asserting that these specific things scale well enough to still work at post-Panamax size.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A bigger challenge would be sourcing enough shantymen to be feasible. I'm not sure that the world has sufficient production capacity to provide the necessary rum for more than a handful of ships.

[–] snf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have it on good authority that the Wellerman will handle this issue, along with any concerns with tea and sugar supply

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rice_Daddy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sailing cargo ship is a thing. There's a record breaker recently in fact.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You underestimate the power of wind, stranger.

[–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You underestimate the force of wetted surface area resistance. The sail area needed to move a modern cargo ship at the snail's pace of old sailing ships would be unmanageably large. You simply couldn't hold enough sail area to get them near their current speeds. These hybrid sail concepts are nice, but all they do is save some fuel.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, I got that information from a different Lemmy comment, and on the spur of your contradiction I went looking myself. My search results are flooded with mostly useless news articles (they went to tell stories, not relay technical information). Regardless, the most ambitious claim I've seen is to reduce emissions by up to 90% for a ship design that can't handle shipping containers and is about 1/4 the size of the largest ships being produced today.

Don't get me wrong, I want this to happen. In fact, I would ban carbon-fuel shipping today, if I could make it happen. That being said, I don't think we'll ever get back to 100% wind power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Feirdro@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They are literally kites—not sails. I’ve never seen a sail flying 100 ft above a ship before.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinnaker

When a vessel is running (meaning moving in the same direction as the wind) it can fly a spinnaker, which is just a kite on short lines.

[–] Bloodyhog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And the load on its sheets is enormous. Oh boy can it cause a problem if anyone makes a mistake handling it! Now imagine the load from the kites proposed. I wonder if that is even feasible with today's materials.

Edit: did some reading around. So it seems at current level the system can be used as a supplementary propulsion saving some fuel. Ahoy, mates, we are back and our sails are higher than ever!

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When it comes to material stresses the sails can always be scaled down, but off the top of my head kevlar and zylon would be good candidates for getting the biggest, toughest sail in an economic fashion.

If you want to go down a related rabbit hole take a look at the sails used in regattas. The technology and money that goes into them is ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nilaus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The mast on the ship in the picture is litteraly 127 feet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I saw it once in sea of thieves. Pretty sure it was a graphics glitch

[–] lakemalcom10@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Supervivens@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

“What differentiates it from other wind solutions,” says Bernatets, “is that the wing is not just pulled by the wind and countered by the ship.” Instead, it flies in figure-of-eight loops, which multiply the pulling effect of the airflow to give what he calls “crazy power.”

“Plus, we fetch the wind 300 meters above the sea surface, where it’s 50% more powerful,” adds Bernatets. The combination “explains why the power is tremendous for a system that is very compact, simple on the bow of the ship, and can be retrofitted on any ship, not just new ships,” he says.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

The retrofitting part is great news

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

“What differentiates it from other wind solutions,” says Bernatets, “is that the wing is not just pulled by the wind and countered by the ship.” Instead, it flies in figure-of-eight loops, which multiply the pulling effect of the airflow to give what he calls “crazy power.”

That's an innovation over square-rigged ships, sure, but not so much over fore-and-aft-rigged ones (where the sails act like aerofoils).

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A 300m line holding turbulent ~~sail~~ kite would never have the chance getting tangled or snapping and killing someone when it whips back

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

Sitting in a metal tube in the sky sounds just as dangerous, yet here we are.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah there's similar problems for the ropes that anchors are attached to as well, so they shouldn't be using those either.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what is wrong with taking stress off the engines? I hate how they report this like it is a joke, because it is still a solid step.

[–] stom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They're not a joke, they're a product called Seawing, made by a French company. They're being being actively tested and can be retro fitted to existing vessels rather than requiring a new design.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct, I think they were saying it was being reported on as if it was a joke. Not being taken seriously as a good step towards reducing carbon emissions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kabynbojski@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they'll steal the wind! How is that helping the environment?

[–] Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

and who's making money off it. cause if there is no money, no one will do it unfortunately.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know this isn't really anything new, but it dies look like they are making progress while is great.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My immediate concern with these is lightning strikes on the kites

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will have planning for that, just like they do the container ship towers which also have to deal with lightening.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

True, I bet it would be really cool to watch these mechanisms in action

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have missed you Mr Picard Maneuver x

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey I literally just finished watching The Battle episode a few minutes ago for the first time. K thx bye now

Hey, that's awesome! Hope you're enjoying the watch.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago

If they really were kites, ships could sail across the sky.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

🙆‍♀️

load more comments
view more: next ›