this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
721 points (98.3% liked)

linuxmemes

25623 readers
1194 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    all 30 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I just donated to Voyager, my Lemmy client.

    [–] aeharding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

    Thanks! πŸ’™

    [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    IMO we all should - pay for Free software. I won't mind if devs start putting a price tag on their work, and it should be the norm to donate to our most-used FOSS projects. I'm just having problems deciding who to donate to, because if all the stuff we use on Linux day in, day out were for pay, I couldn't afford it

    [–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's a sign that you are an adult.

    [–] AestasAeterna@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Not an adult, just have enough money

    [–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    It's an interesting point! would children with enough money pay for something that is free?

    [–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I know it's not necessarily applicable, but your comment made me think of those Stanley mugs.

    [–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

    Do children spend money on those?

    [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

    I find something extremely satisfying giving money to people who are working for free and offering a superb free service. So many awesome libraries that are given to us ad free by people.

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Good that you mention it! Is there a tool that helps me list all of the open source tools I use and divide a fixed donation (say 1% of my income) between them?

    That could even be further improved by keeping usage statistics of the software I run.

    That way Iβ€˜d probably support my OS the most but the more useful stuff would also get more donations.

    If that spread, income streams would steadily increase.

    Edit: now another idea came to me. How about a pact like the fedi pacts for behaving a certain way? Just with donating 1% of income/profit to open source projects you use. That could become a trend and probably change open source A LOT.

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The problem is always how you divide, particularly for libraries. It is hard to rightly estimate. For better or for worse, we should have a union of open source developers and they should divide it up. Just pay the union and they will share that democratically amongst themselves, deciding their own criterias, sorting out edge cases, having a way to process disagreements, etc

    [–] onion@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    So like the wikimedia or openstreetmap foundations?

    For all I care the FSF could handle this actually

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Thats an insane idea! Where can I sign up? Please make a post about it!

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    It's not as simple as having an idea. Everyone can have great ideas, the problem is getting everyone on board and figuring everything else out. I'm not a FOSS dev so I don't have a foot in the community to pitch that. Don't mean to shut you down but it is probably more complicated than I made it out to be, otherwise it would probably exist in some shape

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Thanks for mentioning its not your intent to shut me down. The issue we have isnt lack of people getting on board but every idea having millions of different people pulling them in different directions.

    Example: I filed a complaint against apple for privacy violations. Seems like nobody else did it in this particular case and thats despite millions of people using their devices and being affected by this thing, even talking about it on reddit and here.

    The problem really isnt getting people on board, it is pushing for stuff to become reality.

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    In this case, there are many stakeholders involved. Volunteers, developers on corporate payroll, etc. That alone adds complexity to any solution. Doesn't men no solution can be found, but adds to the inertia since it requires more effort

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I agree. But thats also why I think its best to push as far as one can and hope for others to join or take over once the original person/people are out of steam. This works with founding companies, groups and other movements. This ultimately leads me back to my initial: please make a post, Iβ€˜ll join you. Does it make more sense now?

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    You mean make a post on Lemmy? For me the root problem is still here: I have no contacts in the (admittedly extremely wide) industry and could not build a platform for people to register their projects to. I can only draw the outline of how this thing would work

    Edit: I'll try to write something down and make a post somewhere. Any community suggestions?

    Which is no problem. Causes dont need the most connected, born leader types. They need to start somewhere is all. If its meant to be, it will grow. Everything else is perfectionism imo.

    Depending on the spin, its either interesting for the fediverse, opensource or something else. You can hit me up in dms with a draft if you want.

    [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Maybe this is a naive view, but I wouldn't mind paying a programmer to improve free software when there's something I need. Then everyone can benefit the same way I benefit from other people improving the software in similar or other ways.
    For example, a while ago I realized that the OpenBSD file(1) tool didn't detect utf-8 encoding, which was something I wanted. It doesn't seem like a priority of the devs, but generally an improvement for everyone if it worked. If there was an easy way to pay a programmer to implement it for a reasonable price I could pay for that. If more people wanted the same thing we could share the cost too. Finally if the devs thought it was a feature in line with the goals of the project it could be merged into the main source code and everyone would benefit.
    I wish this system of hiring programmers was easier to navigate.

    [–] eatham@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

    That is a brilliant idea, but make a GitHub issue first so it's a known issue.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

    I would pay for advanced functionality, backups and support. There is no reason a project needs a non profit status. They can make all the money in the world as long as they aren't forcing proprietary software and SaSS.

    [–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

    I'm totally okay with paying for prebuilt images of free software. It's what is meant.

    [–] WhataburgerSr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

    I've made a few contributions to the Linux Mint team and it's free. It has saved a few machines from the e-waste landfills and I have it on my laptop right now. It's super reliable and just works so the devs deserve the extra help.

    [–] CryptoKitten@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    How often does one pay for free/libre software? Unless choosing to send a voluntary contribution to a project, which is not the same as paying in my eyes, it sure has not happened to me in over 25 years when it was easier to order a set of CDs than trying to download the ISOs on a 56k modem.

    Unless choosing to send a voluntary contribution to a project, which is not the same as paying in my eyes

    Why is voluntary contribution not paying?