this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
537 points (99.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6615 readers
380 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Incredibly based.

It helps that Spain has world-class trains and are continuously investing in expanding the network.

I'm so jealous. I wish the complete shitstain right-wingers that cancelled train investment in my country were fired. (out of a cannon into the sun)

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It helps that Spain has world-class trains

As Spaniard I wouldn't go that far.. but yeah they are good. But not all of them 😅 specially the shorter routes. Apart from some maintenance issues, It doesn't help that from time to time a line is down because they have stolen copper wires...

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One tragic fact of life is that it doesn't really take that much to become world-class as far as trains go. The HSR network alone basically places you on the podium.

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

To be fair (and Im from a family of train workers, did my master thesis there), there is a lot of mismanagement and politics, lack of investment and stuff, which decrease the quality of train services. But there's also part of the problems who are inherent to the fact of moving steel boxes safely on thousands of km, without endangering the workers either.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People steal the copper wires everywhere.

I know someone that works in the rail industry with building and maintenance.

It's apparently very important to electrify the wire as soon as you are done with whatever you were doing. Otherwise someone will know that it's not electrified and they will steal it. And the company/state will lose quite a lot of money in raw materials (the overhead wires are expensive as fuck), delays and further work.

Edit: This isn't in some third world country or anything either. This is in a rich first world country that's in the top 10 in terms of HDI and at least top 20 of pretty much every other positive index.

[–] Flanhare@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why not wait for the thieves to start working and then electrify 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That's called extrajudicial killing, and it's generally frowned upon

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Hey dude, my dad is working for the train system. Do you want to be the one cleaning human being parts? Not them.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Because you would have to create some kind of surveillance team to find the thieves and it's generally unethical to kill people. The electricity in those wires won't just hurt, they will kill someone for just getting slightly too close.

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

I was once running to the station in sevilla to get my train. I arrived 40 minutes late. The train departed right after I boarded.

Much love to the renfe, they waited for me :3

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read about world-class and then 40 minutes late...

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Delay is most of the time due to congestion. Expanding the network is the way to reduce that.

[–] lunachocken@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Why bother wasting the resources to send em to space, when a bullet suffices.

[–] sprack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Their trains are great, but the system is confusing AF.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 year ago

Legends 👑

[–] jojowakaki@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this only applies public flights not private flights.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IIRC that's the case in France, but per the article

It isn’t yet known how many flights will actually be impacted by restrictions.

[–] ElCanut@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

Sadly the law in France has been made specifically so that it applies to nearly zero flights. Macron is really good at communicating, but terrible at doing

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jojowakaki@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not applied to private flights from what I grasped. Taylor swift can rest easy.

[–] fraksken 6 points 1 year ago

How about closing airports as well so private jets have no places to land and the overlords can take the fucking train like the rest of us?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Also for connecting flights, or only if the whole trip is a single short haul flight?

[–] Toldry@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

PP member Guillermo Mariscal explained that he believes the initiative is “ineffective” because it would only result in a 0.06 per cent reduction in emissions according to data from the College of Aircraft Engineers (COIAE).

Really? Just 0.06%? How can it be so low?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It depends on what the 100% represents. Does it represent the emissions of just Spain or the whole world? If the latter, then it makes sense.

But every bit counts, so this is a welcomed change - to an extent. Family and work emergencies will have to wait longer with this, for example.

[–] deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It says in the article, the number of flights this would affect might be very small. They originally wanted to ban flights with a train alternative under 4 hours, but that didn't get through.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Because he's from the college of aircraft engineers, who may have a vested interest in flight, and is therefore paid to make that number look as small as possible.

[–] kubica@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The article talks about a plan, which depending on what it includes would vary. In the article one optimistic prediction says 10% the other more pessimistic says 0.06%. Until more decisions are made the real number will be unknown.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It might be a low number, but then again this also seems like a initiative that will affect an even smaller number of people and is targeting something where a completely valid alternative exists, that has lower emissions.

It might not be the end it all solution, but there won't be one of those. So measuring it by that standard seems pointless to me.

I'd rather look at things like: Is there an alternative (and if so, what compromises does it make), what are the relative gains, and how easy is it to implement? And banning short distance flights seems to check those marks in my book.

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are there train stations at the airports for connections?

[–] charlytune@mander.xyz 16 points 1 year ago

I think every airport I've been to in Spain is connected to the rail network. Connection to rail and bus is pretty standard, in Western Europe at least.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Airports are notoriously badly connected to final destinations, while trains usually take you to the city center and other public transport.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All the main airports are reached by train. Spain has relatively cheap high-speed railway network.

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The planes in Spain fall mainly on those avoiding the train?

[–] snake_case_guy@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

As per the article:

Flights with a rail alternative that takes less than two and a half hours will no longer be allowed, “except in cases of connection with hub airports that link with international routes”.

The only trip that I know of that takes less than 2.5 hs by train is Madrid-Barcelona and Madrid-Valencia . But Madrid is an international hub with connections to most of the international routes. So, my thinking is that this would not apply. It might only make sense for private flights, which are already very minor, AFAIK.

Again, smokescreen law, from smokescreen leftist party.

[–] InspiringOne@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Spain is a fake country of horses and like cats and maybe some cows that appeared here in Detroit areas or the Midwest to New York in 2003, before or after the South American brown pride movement thing. It was like a street gang, but not really one. It was actually about tanning brown some. “Oh yeah that Mike guy is a BP member, everyone thought British petroleum nah brown pride”. One day I was like gang members keeping asking if we’re white or brown or how old and then enslaving everyone else if it’s not some dictatorship with everyone in the same gang instead of country. Or some one asking about some guy that was over and I said it was probably him that did it, if not we got another idea about gang members they’re great likable dudes that are hard workers. But it sure ain’t a union, unions suck compared to these gangs. She said what gang I said PB or something. The next day this justin holt guy is like not PB it’s BP. And I’m like oh yeah pb and and I was thinking these guys loved pb and j sandwiches so we ask him and he changes the name of the gang instead. Because it meant we were all peanut butter and Julie was the j. Pb was great but without the jelly it wasn’t that good so it stays separate to make a stand, and I said I must be the white bread that holds it all together, and that’s why they forced us to hide all the money in safes buried outside until the same thing has to happen again in the future because no one stepped in as Asian countries.

All these fake countries exist through some website called fetlife, they should probably update it or fetlife is another Microsoft Windows program. Well Apple since you’ve taken Facebook. Or we thought so.