0ndead

joined 2 years ago
[–] 0ndead 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

I’d argue that a lot of the lower income residents need their cars/parking more to survive. Especially in a high cost of living area.

[–] 0ndead 1 points 19 minutes ago

Your modlog is quite telling

[–] 0ndead 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago) (2 children)

That’s not the case. I’m pro bike, pro-bike lanes. I’m pro bike lane in Berkley. But I also recognize the need for residents of Berkley to have adequate parking.

[–] 0ndead 0 points 39 minutes ago (2 children)
[–] 0ndead 2 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

You would be the only other person in this thread that should be commenting then.

[–] 0ndead 1 points 52 minutes ago (3 children)

So you’re a Berkley resident, and therefore entitled to an opinion?

[–] 0ndead 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago) (1 children)

Exactly, the fuck cars movement already won in Berkeley. Calm the fuck down and let the residents park their cars. And STFU if you don’t drive or bike in Berkley on a regular basis.

[–] 0ndead 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago) (4 children)

You’ve clearly already lost the argument when you resort to insults.

[–] 0ndead 0 points 1 hour ago (14 children)
[–] 0ndead 0 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Have you been to Berkley? It’s the least car-friendly city in the Bay Area. Has great public transportation. Again, it’s a poor example for a fuck cars argument.

[–] 0ndead -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (19 children)

Sounds like you’ve never been there

Maybe stick your commenting on Canadian topics instead of cities you’ve never visited.

[–] 0ndead -3 points 2 hours ago (21 children)

Berkley is a poor example for the fuck cars arguments

42
Hail Grains! (infosec.pub)
 
159
Shots fired at Alameda ICE protest (www.thedailybeast.com)
submitted 10 months ago by 0ndead to c/politics@lemmy.world
view more: next ›