No it doesn't. It posits that if you don't think they are necessary you need to accept and be ok with money laundering on your network.
Album
Lmao who writes this shit. The solution to KYC is just no KYC! And then offer nothing to explain how to implement AML controls!
If you want to use a kycless network you then have to know and accept that it's going to be used for money laundering and that others are not going to transact with you or that platform because you accept that kind of risk.
The banks are obligated by the govt to not take that risk. It doesn't benefit the banks... We've seen they'd much rather not do KYC and take on the money laundering risk because it's far more profitable.
Thank you for keeping the lights on!
One guy needed two
ppl are silly
i know i use IF.
I've been using LW & Mull/IF before the outrage-TOU update and while they're great for me I wouldn't recommend them to everyone. I still keep FF as a backup and many ppl should continue to use FF for the time being as it was JUST A TOU update....for now.
and colours!
Different areas have different lightning bugs too. The ones in southern ontario are not the same as the ones in the midwest US.
Target can't win either way lol.
Rainbow junk on your shelves = boycott
cancel DEI = boycott
Yeah I've seen both of those as well
I feel like the link you just provided completely invalidates the way you started "if you are a giant bank you can ml all you want" but then you show the fines that show you can't do this all you want.
Keep in mind the banks are profiting from others laundering money not from laundering their own money.
"It's big brothers attempt to monitor capital flows."...yes exactly...