Alvaro

The door is the warmest part of the fridge and I would guess this has something to do with the temperature of an average fridge being a bit too cold and producing a less favorable texture so the manufacturer wants you to have the best experience and tells you to put it on the door. Either that or something else probably related to you enjoying it more or using it more.

The Truman Show, Truman.

Or for a different kind of funny, The Truman Show and the human is the director.

Yes, flights are a huge deal. One really long flight (like to the other side of the planet) should still be less co2e pollution than a non-vegan diet for a year, but not by much.

No doubt that flying often is the biggest impact, but most people don't fly often.

That is illegal. while you can choose to do illegal things, it just makes you look like a troll to suggest it as a viable option.

Yeah, I guess that makes sense even without needing a source

Why don't you bring a source to contradict?

This is absolutely not the only paper to support my claim

Lol, do you realize how much land that is? We wouldn't have the resources to develop it, plus most of it is remote.

Also, even if we do develop it, that is a completely different story than using it to feed animals to eat them. It produces a different value to society with different GHG amounts and kinds.

There is:

https://www.wri.org/insights/climate-impact-behavior-shifts

Other than going car free (not possible in many countries where roads are just not bikable or walkable) not flying (yeah, you probably shouldn't and personally I rarely ever do) and switching your home to green energy (again, not really possible in some countries plus high up fron costs keep it impossible for many) the biggest impact is achieved through veganism.

For the most part, not only does vegansim have the biggest positive impact on the environment that can be made with a personal choice, the animal products industries are like the third biggest contributor to climate change after energy (coal, oil, gas, etc) and manufacturing. Plus, as most farm land in the world is used for animal feed, it would free up land for reforestation.

P.s When talking about GHG emissions, it's a really bad idea to use % of total emissions as an indicator of impact. Livestock produce plenty of methane, which is roughly 84 times more impactful than carbon dioxide on the short term (20ish years) but carbon dioxide is more impactful over the long term (centuries) as it does not break down as quickly.

They exist, they are just labled "fail videos"

He definitely knows that AI is NOT virgin