Nope. He said that Russia only had 190,000 troops in the beginning and that number was far too small to conquer all of Ukraine, much less all of Europe. He also used history as an example to make the point that the Nazis used 1.5 million troops, somewhere around that number, to conquer Poland, and that does not even count the Russian invasion from the East. Furthermore, he is a professor, you are not, remember that. He uses facts and logic, you don't.
Russian perspective is legitimate geopolitics just like the Chinese perspective and the Indian perspective, so on. There is no "propaganda" but only national interest. Point out a single instance of propaganda. You are not the decider of whose perspective gets to be told.
You don't understand geopolitics if you only think Western politics that matter. It shows you are a propagandist, a bias person, partial, and no substance. Do you understand there is more to the world than just NATO and the US? There is another world outside your little echo chamber? That you even put up this post shows you don't know what geopolitics is, and therefore in the wrong community. This isn't a US/NATO only community, and they don't own the subject of geopolitics. It involves all nations and countries.
Joe Biden is unfit for command. Look at the publicity Biden pier stunt, over 320 million dollars to pass a few boxes of food to Gaza for a week, then remove the pier permanently. He wants to raise taxes on you. Time to go Joe, time for the first black woman president. Go away now.
To the contrary, I want the problems of society fixed. I want the quality of life of people to be improved, not out of compassion, but out of duty, and by the concept of improvement, in the most efficient way. Liberals always virtue signaling they care about the poor, and so on, yet look at the environment they created. Singapore has one of the most expensive properties in the world and high inequality, yet they have no homeless people.
Karl Marx was born into a Christian culture, and he was culturally Christian. Did Karl Marx disagree with the Bible in regard to poor versus rich? Christianity is subversive; the poor will prevail over the rich, the downtrodden people will prevail over their oppressors, the fool will win over the wise man. Socialism and communism are as scientific as witchcraft and astrology. They are not economic systems. Life isn't fair; that is the real world. It is through work, applied knowledge, that you make your state better than before.
Being homeless is not a criminal offense, and how do you know it is not their own fault? How do you know they are just minding their own business? Talk about spurious assumptions and generalizations. Get out of town... Let me guess, you believe the poor, the hobos, and minorities who are the subpar classes deserve your compassion because they are underlings of other classes, that society is structurally unfair, and the underlings need a free pass, while the superior classes need to acknowledge their sin of being better up in class. That is your fallacious assumptions and beliefs. That's your opinion. You have a fundamentally Marxist brain that stems from religion. Ask the insurance companies, local businesses, and neighborhoods if hobos "just mind their own business". Portland had your beliefs until they realized they're making their own quality of life lower. Showing your tolerance and compassion for bad behavior, bad lifestyles, and even bad people do not work. They are much better examples of managed cities in the world than the liberal let-live, mind your own business, crap holes of Western society. You are excrementally wrong.
Rich people use drugs as well, but they do not decrease the economic quality of the area and generate a lot of crimes and nuisance. For tourism, it is necessary to clean up the encampments, and sleeping homeless to market attractions. Since they are poor and addicted to drugs, probably feel screwed by society, they are more likely to steal. They have not showered in ages, do you enjoy being next to stinky people?
The Europe has a Christian culture and people are aware generally what is wrong and what is right. In Afghanistan, they don't see anything wrong with pedophilia or viewing females as possessions. Afghanistan is also a tribal place, where humans are viewed differently according to their tribe. The state of mind is quite clear; people of other tribes are not worthy of respect, only of convenience. This is why mass immigration from such countries is not recommended.
Where do you watch these Israeli videos?