AndriiZvorygin

joined 1 month ago
[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

Well on the plus side, they are so bogged down with infighting they forgot about us. Praise be to God!

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

Yeah this is probably the only long term solution, and something China may actually be willing to do. Like they made HarmonyOS open source for example. The main thing is having "unlocked cars" similar to "unlocked phones" so they can be reflashed with Canadian vetted version of the software.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah besides jets are basically obsolete now. Drones and missiles are the current state of the art and they can be manufactured in Canada. Canada should be taking notes from Iran and Ukraine for dealing with a larger belligerent. The F16s Ukraine got were hit by drones. Anything above ground is not safe from enemy bombardment due to satellite etc.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 0 points 2 days ago

California population is the same of all of Canada combined, high speed rail can Only pay for itself with massive population using transit. Basically with our population sizes in Canada, traditional rail with electric overhang IS viable for like freight even now, but for passengers it will make sense if we exceed $3/lt at the pump, then by $5/lt at the pump most people will be using it, and it will be able to cover its costs.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca -2 points 2 days ago

Fair enough using that overhead wire system apparently can scale economically to thousands of kilometers and already has in Siberia. If we follow that model for upgrading existing Canadian rail: Single track: about C$100 to 120 million per 100 km Double track: about C$180 to 220 million per 100 km Those are good hardware-heavy corridor numbers for wire, poles, substations, and power hookup on a reasonably straightforward existing alignment.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca -2 points 2 days ago

I hear you, if we follow the Siberian model we can do it. Just not like maglev or light rail or any of the other super expensive implementations.

With Siberian style we can get for upgrading existing Canadian rail: Single track: about C$100 to 120 million per 100 km Double track: about C$180 to 220 million per 100 km Those are good hardware-heavy corridor numbers for wire, poles, substations, and power hookup on a reasonably straightforward existing alignment.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Okay bro your numbers are crazy whatever you are suggesting is not gonna happen we can't spend billions per hundred kilometers that is totally unsustainable.

If we follow the Siberian electrification model for upgrading existing Canadian rail: Single track: about C$100 to 120 million per 100 km Double track: about C$180 to 220 million per 100 km Those are good hardware-heavy corridor numbers for wire, poles, substations, and power hookup on a reasonably straightforward existing alignment.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca -2 points 2 days ago

Okay yeah if we do it Siberian style that is proven method so should be fine for Canada, which is much smaller and warmer country.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Alright you convinced me if we follow their design we can do it.

On the Trans-Siberian Railway, the electricity is not in the rail itself. ✔ How it actually works Power comes from an overhead wire (called a catenary) The train has a pantograph on top The pantograph presses upward and draws electricity from the wire The steel rails are used as the return path (ground)

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The maintenance nightmare is the main problem on any long track. Electric trains are fine within a municipality because it is short distances and frequent stops. For a Go train that goes from Barrie to Toronto traditional rail is the only thing that makes sense. We are running out of diesel globally, our total fossil liquids production is on pace to be 60% lower by 2050. With every 5% reduction in oil production prices go up 50%. As you may have noticed it starting with Hormuz. Which is still being mediated by reserve releases But if Hormuz stays closed for 3-6 months we could see prices rise 200% to $3-4/lt

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 0 points 3 days ago

Power to the standard rail is massive infrastructure. We need rail between all municipalities basically. Oil is going away. At 3-5$ a litre it will be too expensive for people to commute to work. And we will need rail lines between all municipalities in Canada as traditional rail is the most energy efficient transportation system we have ever developed.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think let her have it if she wants it.

6
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
 

Sent this email to the senators and federal politicians that were doing those recent AI committees, hearing from experts in the field.

Dear AI and effects interested politicians,

You've heard many expert testimonies of people in the narrow field of study of AI, but one of the outstanding questions is societal impacts and what to do about them, which I can answer as I meet with leading scientists and engineers around the world every month on the topic of the many global factors at play in our past, present and future.

The crux of the matter is that we live on a physical planet with limits in resources, though we have more than enough resources for everyone, especially in Canada, the distribution of resources is what will define whether quality of life continues to decline or takes a turn to long term improvement. Local and decentralized AI has the potential to make the transition not only feasible, but to remake Canada as a thriving model for the world if the people and leadership want to use it that way.

One of the most critical understanding in order to be able to pivot from the escalating real wealth inequality in Canada to real wealth distribution and prosperity for the Canadian people is seeing beyond what Plato described as the Allegory of the Cave. The narrative begins deep inside the dark cavern, where captives are chained against a wall, accepting the flickering black silhouettes of animals and puppets cast by a fire as their entire reality. While these shadows define existence for those who remain in chains, the story moves to the right where figures have broken free from their bonds to begin the arduous climb up the rocky cliff face. As they ascend away from the artificial firelight, they leave behind the illusions of the cave to emerge into the bright sunlight and green grass above, standing at the top as they perceive truth directly instead of through the distorted projections below. allegory of the cave How it pertains to our current situation is those shadows on the walls are fears and abstractions that often fit in the Overton window of the wall, but the reality is that Canadians are flesh and blood homo sapien mammals with basic needs that need to be met in order for them to thrive and be productive. And those needs can not be met long term with abstractions like money but have to be met with real wealth like land.

For example the recent land transfers in B.C. took land from private citizens and gave it to band councils, an organization that was instituted by the Canadian government long ago to make it easier to control indigenous people as an abstraction, while not actually allowing any individual indigenous homo sapien mammal to have ownership of the soil. So even though 95% of BC is owned by abstractions/corporations, that wasn't enough for the government, and was escalated, reducing quality of life even further for the homo sapien mammals.

Why are AI data centers responsible for 99.5% of US's 2025 GDP growth, and why was much of the funding coming from middle eastern Oil barons? Because our Real/physical global oil reserves (Not the SEC fictions) of crude sufficiently high quality to run a society are running low, and AI has the promise of being able to do more with less. The transition is not caused by AI, it's caused by us running low on fossil fuels, every barrel of oil is harder to get than the previous. The recent Venezuela and Iran crises being yet other symptoms.

A local AI even late last year that one can run on a laptop, was as smart or smarter as an average human on a wide variety of text based tasks. And if a person has a gaming Graphics Card in their desktop, they can consult with a multi-PhD level intelligence at home. Yes they have limitations, just like humans, and need structured organization and good quality information to produce good results.

For example much of Canadian news is currently owned by Postmedia, a US based hedge fund. One practical alternative I'm working on is using local AI model refineries to generate local news based on municipal, county, police websites. It's also possible to make local social media discussion forms, with compassionate, tireless AI moderators, always willing to listen, give a pep talk, and reminder to follow the rules.

The Senate has been working on an UBI bill for years, but unfortunately it is just another abstraction that can at best serve as a stop gap measure for the transition. To illustrate a simple example based on historical precedent, for every 5% decline in oil, oil prices go up 50% and food prices go up 10%. Straight of Hormuz has 25% of global oil supply. At $3-$5/lt most people can't afford to drive to work. Attempting to pour money on it will only cause inflation.

Even if Trump admits defeat and apologizes to Iran thus meeting their stated peace terms and we go back to "normal" 25%+ of homo sapiens in Canada are food insecure growing at 4%+ a year. No amount of "jobs" or UBI will help either, because the fundamental problem is it takes three fossil fuel calories to get 1 calorie of food to the grocery store. Industrial farming as we know it is not viable without cheap and abundant fossil fuels. But homo sapiens need to eat, and believe it or not, food grows in soil with the application of rainwater and sunlight, which we in Canada are blessed to have plenty of.

One of the common complaints I've heard "but no one knows how to grow food anymore" which is where local AI comes in, multi-level PhD grade educator available in every municipality for any given use case from agriculture to electrical engineering and social cohesion you name it, and we can implement local AI refineries running on solar power to provide all the information we need with fiber optic cables and traditional rail between municipalities solving our information and transportation needs.

Another complaint I've heard is "most of Canada is uninhabitable" but as a descendant of reindeer herders, there is not a hectare of mainland Canada my relatives can not live and thrive on. Anywhere trees grow we grow food forests, anywhere animals roam we herd them. We have herded raindeer sustainably for over three thousand years. The main obstacle is government land hoarding for the benefit of abstractions and shadows.

We can have a beautiful high tech future in symbiosis with the land, water, plants, animals and technology, but for that we have to forgive, love and be kind to one another enough to say that yes, homo sapiens do deserve to have enough land to meet their basic needs. There is no other way, and even if the government doesn't agree, then the endless course of history will simply trample the government abstraction, as homo sapiens need to live and will continue to do so regardless of shadows and legal fictions.

As always by the supremacy of God, and the rule of Law, God wins. If you wish to be part of the victory is up to you.

May you be blessed, Andrii Zvorygin, Owen Sound, Grey County, Ontario, Canada.

view more: next ›