If your browser isn't broken, then why can't it show this jpg?
Antimutt
joined 2 years ago
Thermally conductive liquids on the outside, light, thermally insulating solids on the centre. Otherwise it's more difficult to reduce the temperature.
New clothes have a machining oil residue from the manufacturing process. This gets cleaned off when you wash them. But when you first wear them you're well oiled!
In your first post of Pixeldrain ther wasent an 1.avif file, but one with the extension jxl and a broken image icon. Now you say it’s a simple jpg, which naturally can be opened even with the obsolete paint.
Nope. I never said that. But I did put before you a challenge to open that, perfectly functional, jpg in your browser...the one you've never had problems with when opening images.
I don’t want to download an image or file to see it
Nor do I and I don't. As the second screen capture, saved as an avif, showed you: my Firefox handles jxl just fine due to the add-in. And beta versions, like Firefox Nightly, handle the format natively.
here we speak about image sharing with embed code to insert in Lemmy or other sites, like I do it with the screenshots I make,
Me too. But I found FileCoffee didn't support my first jxl screen capture of the NoScript report of FileCoffee's javas use. A disappointment, when you had said it "supports ALL types of files".
The best compression algorithms are good at this. Look at the size of this Reddit download and compare when you uncompress it.
tl;dr Waititi: Don't believe what our own security says, China is our pal.
The description of the Firefox plug-in explains why. Want a pic of the pic??
Edit: Next you'll be telling me your browser cannot open a simple jpg when, if you download it, decent graphics software will open it just fine. 😏
view more: next ›
There could be more to it than that - like take up ballet.