Apepollo11

I'm guessing it's to break down the fat / grease in the poop.

The hot water will speed up the reaction, with the added benefit of possibly expanding the pipe just enough to make a difference.

Just a guess, though!

Yikes. What are you flushing down your toilet that you need a auger to unclog it?

My wife still has a book from when she studied Archaeology at uni called "From Savagery to Civilization" by Grahame Clark.

Civilization is what we make it to be, and is usually measured by the norms and standards of the country doing the judging.

The book is from the 40s. By the standards of the day, a lot of what we do now would probably be considered uncivilised. We work from home, eat meals on our own, and rely on a court of opinion more than a court of law. Homelessness is endemic and many people are working around the clock for subsistence wages. Classical definitions of civilisations - community, care for the vulnerable, improved quality of life - are all being stripped away.

I don't think the term "uncivilised" can really be taken as a slur, at least no more than the word "bad" can be, because it's just a reflection of what the speaker values.

Yep, no more reaching the airport at the last second and being hurried onto a plane.

"Sorry, you didn't show up two hours early - there's no way we're letting you on".

It's just like any big technological breakthrough. Some people will lose their jobs, jobs that don't currently exist will be created, and while it'll create acute problems for some people, the average quality of life will go up. Some people will use it for good things, some people will use it for bad things.

I'm a tech guy, I like it a lot. Before COVID, I used to teach software dev, including neural networks, so seeing this stuff gradually reach the point it has now has been incredible.

That said, at the moment, it's being put into all kinds of use-cases that don't need it. I think that's more harmful than not. There's no need for Copilot in Notepad.

We have numerous AI tools where I work, but it hasn't cost anyone their job - they just make life easier for the people who use them. I think too many companies see it as a way to reduce overheads instead of increasing output capability, and all this does is create a negative sentiment towards AI.

Hey, maybe you do.

But I'm not arguing anything contentious here. Everything I've said is easily testable and verifiable.

Give it a try.

The key is in the different prompts. I don't think I should really have to explain this, but different prompts produce different results.

Ask it to create something, it creates something.

Ask it to check something, it checks something.

Is it flawless? No. But it's pretty reliable.

It's literally free to try it now, using ChatGPT.

One of those Bugs Bunny / Yosemite Sam door-after-door-after-door affairs.

Basically have two short stretches of corridor with a door either end. The door at the far end of corridor 1 leads to corridor 2. The door at the far end of corridor 2 leads back to corridor 1.

The mechanisms triggering this are pressure plates along the centre of the corridor 2, skirting along the sides will avoid triggering the plates and allow you to go to the next room.

If a player makes a hole in the door / destroys the door entirely (which I'm pretty sure my players would), they'll see the distant room magically change to the corridor when they step on the pressure plate.

If you look for acrylic paint sets on Amazon, you'll find tons of them have reviews testifying whether or not they're suitable for minis.

I'm talking about the artist tube sets, not the pots, here.

The key factor in suitability for these is the amount of pigment. The consistency can be changed easily with water.

Even more shockingly, Mississippi only officially ratified the amendment to abolish slavery in... 1995.

And only officially submitted the paperwork concerning said ratification to the US Archives in... 2013.

No rush, guys. No rush.

"Not being cool enough to say where you are from" is a weird way for them to phrase it. If they're British, they might be saying it ironically (I use the phrase "well, if you're not cool enough..." as a reference to the old peer-pressure educational videos myself). Otherwise, they might be young, and clumsily trying to peer-pressure you, or old and out-of-touch enough to think that's an effective way to get a young person to give up information.

So, three options. They're either being ironic, clumsy, or creepy. No harm in playing safe and blocking them.