Arcka

joined 2 years ago
[–] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

The wealthy ones didn't need to resort to veterinary medicine - their doctors were willing to be paid to prescribe the human version of those drugs. Legitimate drugs that save many lives, just not helpful against viruses like covid.

 

A unanimous Supreme Court dismissed Mexico's claim that U.S. gun manufacturers aided and abetted the pipeline of weapons from the U.S. to Mexican drug cartels.

"Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant gun manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers," Justice Elena Kagan, one of the court's three liberals, wrote for the court.

At issue was Mexico's claim that Smith & Wesson and other gunmakers were turning a blind eye to hundreds of thousands of high-powered weapons made in the U.S that are illegally trafficked into in the hands of Mexican cartels.

Mexico argued that it is a country where guns are supposed to be difficult to get. There is just one store in the whole country where guns can be bought legally, yet the nation is awash in illegal guns sold most often to the cartels. Mexico maintains that gushing pipeline of what it calls "crime guns" comes from the United States where manufacturers know which dealers are the bad actors.

"You can't hide behind the middleman and pretend like you don't know what's happening," Jonathan Lowy, co-counsel for Mexico and president of Global Action on Gun Violence, told NPR earlier this year.

But the gun industry found that argument flawed.

Lawrence Keane, counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms industry, told NPR earlier this year that every sale to a consumer by a licensed retailer is approved by the federal government, and every transaction requires a federally mandated background check.

Mexico is arguing that a "lawful distribution system that's approved under federal law … is aiding and abetting cartels," Keane said. "If that was all that was required, Budweiser would be responsible for drunk driving accidents all across the United States, and apparently including Mexico."

Ultimately, a unanimous Supreme Court agreed.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 47 points 3 weeks ago

Not just Texas. They can access them nationwide without warrants. An attempt to crowdsource a db of installations is at https://deflock.me/

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

His dainty wrinkled hands make the tacos look so big

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

Alternative reasons (not mutually exclusive):

  • The organization has outdated policies that make delivering changes difficult.
  • The systems used in development and delivery haven't been invested in enough to automate repetitive steps, optimize workflow, and increase safety of changes.

Again, complex changes are obviously going to take more time, but if the simplest changes take significant time or effort then something is wrong.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Until 2011 you could just watch wifi traffic for all the unencrypted creds/sessions.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago

If you run into this again, maybe you can use pursuit of efficiency to get proof?

"If we really want to find out why, we can use a Value-stream mapping approach to analyze the process. We might even identify additional specific opportunities where we're able to speed up!"

By documenting all steps in a process and timing each one you'd be able to identify where the difference is, and whether a critical step is being skipped. It really doesn't have to take much time or effort. If management can't be bothered to make that happen, then they must not really care about efficiency.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Yep. A very different example is here in Minnesota: you can register on election day at the polling place, and one accepted way to identify is having someone "vouch" for you.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even more strawman arguments. Read back through the comments - I never said anything about fire extinguishers, and am not defending anyone who is lax on safety.

Most enthusiasts are very serious about safety but know that the implementation details are situational.

Accidents are also very rare. If we want to try to reduce the small percentage who don't take safety seriously, we should start early and make a safety course part of everyone's schooling.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is English not your first language? 'Their' in that context refers to the person you were replying to: SupraMario.

And as far as Midwesterners and more specifically my political beliefs; while we Minnesotans have a proud tradition of independence, we're not all Jesse Ventura. Our most popular party is the DFL, which is somewhat distinct from the national Democrat party, and we've supported (D) presidential candidates more than any other state. I'm more in the camp of 'If you go far enough left you get the guns back'. Every gun club I've been a member of has had strong membership support of safe handling and storage, but what that looks like differs based on multiple factors such as whether there are children in the household. Not drinking before or during shooting is often in the club's bylaws.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Really? You shouldn't have to put in much effort to realize that not every adult has children or has family with children.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (21 children)

The strawman is that you assume children would ever be in their home. If the guns are behind locked doors away from children, they're secured.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

In most of the US, there is no legal requirement of registering a weapon to a person. I think you're confusing that with the Wisconsin law restricting the unsupervised use of dangerous weapons by those under 18.

view more: next ›