Attacker94

joined 4 months ago
[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm not the least bit surprised considering I didn't know this event existed until articles started popping up.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Legally speaking it doesn't, but it does grant him many more ways to use executive powers which he could definetly levy to accumulate enough power to remove term limits from the equation.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Except they will stay on their high horse and only give it to extended support this time around, that way they get what they want and they'll be able to spin it against the people who didn't opt in.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Maybe I was just missing pertinent information, but I thought a zero day was an attack that could be exploited in a very short time frame that has remained unpatched, I didn't realize there was a hierarchy to the different stages.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

How do you figure, I haven't seen the actual text, is it written ambiguously? If not, I would imagine that they be able to enforce it, the only thing is the scope is very small.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Has anyone been able to find the text of the law, the article didn't mention the penalties, I want to know if this actually means anything.

Edit: I found a website that says the penalty follows 5000*sum(n+k) where n is number of days since first infraction, this has a closed form of n^2+n= (7500^-1)y where y is the total compounded fee. This makes it cost 1mil in 11 days and 1bil in a year.

reference

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

There was a link in the article about that, it was saying that they are just requiring self reporting, I don't know the political context in California, but it seems like you wouldn't push this and then turn around and try the id thing, but I am by no means an expert at predicting the idiocracy of politicians.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What area do you live in that reticulum has enough coverage to remove the dependency on cell service

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I would highly recommend posting your issue with full logs in the cachyos forum and possibly the arch forum, there are many people there who will help you diagnose your issue. As for x11 vs Wayland, currently the difference doesn't matter for the general user, but keep in mind that x11 is close to being deprecated and will not be a valid windowing system for much longer, so I would recommend to try fixing your Wayland issues if you can.

Are you using oss or proprietary driver for your GPU, this may be where some of your issue lies.

Not that I think it is the issue, but have you tried updating the system with paru? You may have a weird interaction with an aur package.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I follow, it seems like the issue you are running into is a hardware one, the software may be trying to compensate, but it seems like a performance issue first and foremost. I'm just curious if that is the case since I can't think of another difference between you and I.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see what phone you have in that post.

Could you clarify?

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is actually surprisingly stable nowadays, the core system has become very meticulously maintained which means 9/10 times if you encounter an issue it won't brick the system and you only lose access to some package or program until it is fixed

view more: next ›