BB84

joined 10 months ago
[–] BB84@mander.xyz 90 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (19 children)

The article over-dramatizes the story. This "deeply wrong" discrepancy is less than 10%. CMB measurements predict a Hubble constant of around 68km/s/Mpc. Distance ladder measurements get around 73km/s/Mpc.

Our current understanding of the universe the Lambda-CDM model is still wildly successful and it's more likely that the true correct model of the universe will be a correction/extension to Lambda-CDM rather than a completely new theory (although if it is a completely new theory that would be pretty cool).

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The most anticapitalist instance getting a .com domain would be hilarious

But there gotta be more to the story. Was the registrar being "shady" as @hendrik@palaver.p3x.de said? Why did federation take so long?

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

The link is helpful. Thanks!

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Thanks! The link is helpful.

Look like they got the domain back a while ago. Wonder why federation took so long.

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sorry I should have clarified: not looking for Hexbear lore in general. I have seen a lot of Hexbear content, so I have a solid understanding on the site and the users. Don't want to start a debate about that here because that debate always turn nasty.

What I am looking for is: what happened in the past month-ish? How did you all lost your domain? How and when did you get it back? Why did it take so long for federation to be back? Is there any other change made to the site during this downtime?

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 52 points 2 months ago

I recommend critically reading the paper. It is quite accessible to those with college-level science background.

Most importantly, it is still highly controversial whether this galaxy rotation direction bias actually exists. If you look at section 4 of the paper, the author is debating against different groups that did similar surveys and found no bias. Someone needs to actually work through this author's methodology as well as those of other groups and figure out what is going on.

If there is indeed a bias, that is super exciting! An anisotropic universe due to being in a black hole would be a very cool explanation. But given the ongoing debate, a general-audience publication like Independent presenting this rotation bias as a given fact is very poor journalism.

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

If only the new US regime could copy from the PRC by funding and promoting scientific research😔

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 6 points 3 months ago

Data sent entirely in the clear occurs during the initial registration of the app, including:

  • organization id
  • the version of the software development kit used to create the app
  • user OS version
  • language selected in the configuration

Doesn't like very important information. Anyway, if you care about privacy you should not be using the official app or API. Go on OpenRouter and use DeepSeek models served by other inference providers with better privacy policies.

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As stupid as that sounds, you are not totally wrong.

@don@lemm.ee and @kopasz7@sh.itjust.works you are misunderstanding what "observable universe" means. The observable universe is defined by the particle horizon, but the universe that can affect us in the future is defined by the event horizon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon says

The particle horizon differs from the cosmic event horizon, in that the particle horizon represents the largest comoving distance from which light could have reached the observer by a specific time, while the cosmic event horizon is the largest comoving distance from which light emitted now can ever reach the observer in the future.

But even the cosmological event horizon distance is dependent on our model of the universe's expansion, which in turn depends on the content of the universe. An event such as a vacuum collapse will drastically alter the content and the expansion rate, rendering our calculation of the event horizon invalid. So "snap changes..." may in fact be the case.

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

That's why I wanted to confirm what you are using lol. Some people on Reddit were claiming the full thing, when run locally, has very little censorship. It sounds somewhat plausible since the web version only censors content after they're generated.

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You're probably running one of the distillations then, not the full thing?

 

I saw a few math memes so I figure these are allowed here

 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›