this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
700 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

17426 readers
1897 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] julianh@lemm.ee 57 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Garfield, did you move a small region of the universe to a true vacuum state?

[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

What if the true vacuum state is just different enough for new physics, such that everyone gets psychic powers and nothing else changes.

Haters would say the real true vacuum state will take away my powers and I would psychically attack them for that view

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The neat thing is the collapse travels at the speed of light, so nobody will ever know what hit them.

[–] hDGGgrLpg8nEucjxWnJz@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Maybe it's already on the way

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 10 points 10 months ago

We can only hope

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

It definitely is if anyone placed it on a high surface near a cat.

Maybe it's arriving all the time but we don't notice because of quantum immortality.

[–] don@lemm.ee 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Since the collapse would happen only at the speed of light, and the universe is so vast, it could have been happening for millions of years by now and the human race could still die by natural extinction before it gets anywhere near us. If the collapse originates from beyond the observable universe, it’d never reach us.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think time is a dimension this shit is not restrained upon movement through the way we are. Mostly because it destroys the structure itself.

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Space is emerging faster than it can transmit changes. This is why no light can reach us beyond the observable universe.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Assuming that's actually how it really works and doesn't snap changes...

[–] BB84@mander.xyz 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

As stupid as that sounds, you are not totally wrong.

@don@lemm.ee and @kopasz7@sh.itjust.works you are misunderstanding what "observable universe" means. The observable universe is defined by the particle horizon, but the universe that can affect us in the future is defined by the event horizon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon says

The particle horizon differs from the cosmic event horizon, in that the particle horizon represents the largest comoving distance from which light could have reached the observer by a specific time, while the cosmic event horizon is the largest comoving distance from which light emitted now can ever reach the observer in the future.

But even the cosmological event horizon distance is dependent on our model of the universe's expansion, which in turn depends on the content of the universe. An event such as a vacuum collapse will drastically alter the content and the expansion rate, rendering our calculation of the event horizon invalid. So "snap changes..." may in fact be the case.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is from Waterworld, right? Troublingly relatable.

[–] don@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it’s from Waterworld.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

Oh I should rewatch. Last time I saw in the drive in.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 10 months ago

Favorite moment in the film.

[–] electricyarn@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

They put so much heart into a character with barely any screen time.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is an entire sub-genre in Comics of cartoons riffing on Garfield like this one. Nearly every cartoonist has done it and, oh my lord, it fills me with joy & reminds me why I actually love people.

[–] sheepishly@fedia.io 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly Jim Davis has even said he likes and approves of such things. Wasn't there a Garfield minus Garfield book published at some point with his blessing?

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

ImSorryJon was popular too

[–] JayDee@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That big goopy mess at the end was mostly just lasagna

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You just made me snort diet Sprite.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

whotookkarl: joke

lambalicious: rips a line of diet Sprite fuck yeah

[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Scranton reality anchors be like

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Garfield don't disrupt the Gellar Field!

B̷̡̮̪̃̂̓͑l̶̼̖͓̄ȯ̴̺̘͕͂̚͠o̸̰̩͑͑̈́͠d̸͓̟̯̥̑ ̵̻̈̽̄f̶̥̩̗̪͑̆͐ő̶̱̲̙͑r̴̰̠̤͒́͆͝ ̷͔̯̠͈̇t̶̤̥͊̒̐h̶̳̘̀̓̔e̶̢̺͖̋́͑ ̶̖̈́̎b̵̠̌l̵̞̇̏͠͠ó̸̯̪̹͒o̷̩̤̔̉̅̓d̸̝́̋ ̴͔̲͖̼͌̔̋̏g̵͖̩̀̈́̏͠ỏ̵̮̊d̷̹̲̣̲́̋̀͑ ̵̩̞̓̈s̶̱̮̽k̷̘̈́̊u̴̢̮̳̕͠l̵̢̮̭̎́l̶͙̝̲͐͛̓͝s̵̰̩̗̾͜ ̸̨̮̿̚f̷͚̹͊ơ̵̻͒̓r̷͔͋̎̈́̌ ̸͚͝t̷̖̫͈̃͋̆ḩ̶̙̠̅̃e̴͎̬̪̐́́͝ ̵͙̦̙̂͑̋̈ś̴͉k̷͓̪̆̚͝u̵̯͑̅l̸̪̖̫̇̓͘l̷̞̠͉͒̈̕͜͠ ̸̟͌̿t̸̼̺̽̆̿h̷̡̙̆̓͂̌ṙ̴̡̠͚̿͂̕o̶̧̜͑̇͋n̷̹͆ẽ̵̛̙̪̻̱

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago

Garfield would be Slaaneshi - excessive amounts of lasagna

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Obligatory "I'm sorry Jon"

[–] baisabangauzu@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Philosophy of the Street-poop lifestyle

[–] zzx@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this what Schid's ladder is about? Great book btw

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago

adds it to the pile