BetterDev

joined 2 years ago
[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

Upvote for sway, but the word graduate there feels out of place, though to be honest I havent given NIX an earnest shot.

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Of course. It's your life, live it how you see fit. I've definitely been in similar shoes.

On a friendlier note, may I just say, you have quite a way with words, and your choice of phrase sparks joy in me. I hope you do find a better life after your debts are paid, as much as I hope you have a good rest of the year, with many more to come.

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sometimes it's okay to be a bit rude. It's rare, but every now and again, necessary in order to not become a doormat. It is totally normal and human to try to change your environment (including the behaviour of others) to suit yourself and your happiness.

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm great, thanks for asking. I had just woken up and I haven't been sleeping much lately. It's very possible that what I percieved as a perfectly normal way to state that I was taken aback that you could say that about this math problem, came across to you instead as an assault. Please know that wasn't my intention, and I regret the way I phrased that. Thank you for your concern.

Just fucking read the content before you comment next time, okay pal? 😂

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

no

it's

fucking

not

This is just basic algebra, this is actually how the problems in algebra I are written. What the fuck?

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, if you use an arbitrary standardized measuring stick, the problem goes away, as it is no longer infinite.

Still a fun thought experiment to demonstrate how unintuitive infinities are!

Anyway, major kudos to you for engaging with this thread in good faith! That is so rare these days, I barely venture to comment anymore. Respect.

... and thank you for the opportunity to share a weird math fact!

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

And it may very well be true, but we can't prove it mathematically.

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Exactly! It is unintuitive, but there are as many infinite elements of the set of all real numbers between 0 and 1, as there are in the set between 0 and 100.

I hope this demonstrates what the people here arguing for the paradox are saying, to the people who are arguing that one is obviously longer.

Just because something is obvious, doesn't make it true :)

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Its true that not all infinities are equal, but the way we determine which infinities are larger is as follows

Say you have two infinite sets: A and B A is the set of integers B is the set of positive integers

Now, based on your argument, Asia has the largest infinite coastline in the same way A contains more numbers than B, right?

Well that's not how infinity works. |B| = |A| surprisingly.

The test you can use to see if one infinity is bigger than another is thus:

Can you take each element of A, and assign a unique member of B to it? If so, they're the same order of infinity.

As an example where you can't do this, and therefore the infinite sets are truely of different sizes, is the real numbers vs the integers. Go ahead, try to label every real number with an integer, I'll wait.

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the early days of the internet, well, I should say, in the early days of the social internet, generating engagement was not so easy. Most people treated the internet as a passive activity, like a newspaper or bulletin board. Something to read, find information, be entertained by, but not contribute to. Most sites were just beginning to implement visit counters, so they could see they were generating hits, but not very much new content. How to address this? How do we get those passive readers to touch the keys and contribute to this beautiful online collaboration engine? Deep in the SomethingAweful forums, a new online behavior was formulating. Something that would soon become known as trolling. No, not like the trolls of today who oftentimes do it to promote some political ideology or cast another asunder. No not like those others who use the term for simply cyberbullying. What I'm talking about takes brains. It takes effort. It takes craft. You're not trying to bully someone off a platform, you're trying to get them to add to the conversation. You're not just trying to provoke any reaction, you're trying to get them to be human online. Anger? Spite? Annoyance? Yes. Those are all tools in the trolls's toolbox, but so are complements, flattery, playing dumb, and confusion. Trolling is an art. It's more chaotic than evil. If you've trolled correctly, nobody will know you've trolled at all.

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Offered them as tribute to the gods, probably

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Like it was made for actual humans to use!

This is othering to the rest of us that just read manuals, understand how the tools work, and like them just fine.

Its fine to like nushell, no hate here, but you don't have to dis what works (and has worked) for almost everyone else for so long.

What about: "wow I am really impressed with the QOL features in nushell!" Instead of "everyone who doesnt like this is not human"?

212
Lydia (programming.dev)
 
 

Get a wok. You can craft restaurant quality dishes in minutes. This little number was made from mostly leftovers, fed 3 people, and was downright delicious.

8
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by BetterDev@programming.dev to c/lemmybread@lemmy.world
 

I know, I know, I'm late to the sourdough game, but I've been thoroughly enjoying easy bread with commercial yeast, so I wanted to give sourdough a shot.

Followed the recipe from Joshua Wiessman's "Unapologetic Cookbook" (side note: great cookbook), twice, but I couldn't get the dough to turn out right. It always seemed overly hydrated and liquid.

I've been reading through this community, watching videos, and cooking easy bread long enough though that I finally threw up my hands and decided to have a go at it myself.

I started with about 10g of starter, added about 450g of bread flour, 1/4 cup of sugar (to increase rise), and a spoonful of salt. Then let that mix in the stand mixer till pretty homogeneous. Next I added 1.5 cups of 100°F water, and mixed in.

At this point it was still very liquidy, so I mixed in quite a bit more bread flour until it "looked right" with an appropriate amount of shaggyness.

I then let that rest for a while, and came back with the dough hook about every 30 minutes. At one point it still looked a bit too wet, so I added even more bread flour. I just worked this in with the hook.

After all my working I was worried about overdoing it, so I switched to stretch and folds, of which I did about 3 over the next several hours.

Finally I left it alone for about an hour, and when I returned, it was nice and risen.

I turned it out into my working space, added flour, cut and shaped, and placed into the floured bannetons. I let them rest in the bannetons for about an hour before I refrigerated them overnight.

I let them rest while the oven was heating this morning, and followed my normal baking routine, but I adjusted the temp up by about 50°, based on the Weissman recipe, which I feel was a mistake, so next time I'll just stick to 450°F.

The result was good. Though I can still taste sugar, so I'm going to cut it way down in the next batch. I'm also thinking I may not split into two loafs, and to bake at a lower temp next time.

All in all, I'd say this is my first successful attempt, and I'm excited for the next iteration. Any tips or sage wisdom from fellow bread people would be greatly appreciated!

view more: next ›