CatsPajamas

joined 3 days ago

I mean you know that literally all of those wars had collaborators. Entire collaborationist states, in large part. It didn't help South Vietnam.

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess I don't understand. Why? Mocking the idea reinforces the idea necessarily?

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why? If the population here was as committed as a population overseas I hardly see what the difference is, besides the fact that Americans are way better armed.

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I just figured this might actually work on a certain kind of guy. No slight meant towards the small peened

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aren't laser printers super toxic?

https://dontandbother.etsy.com/listing/4377430088

I've got some other leftyish stuff on there.

Maybe I can get my first sale 😂

Ok. TY for the clarity! I won't spam!

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Idk if I'm allowed to post a link

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would love to see a source on a state blanket banning firearms post bill of rights.

Because that did not happen.

I can almost guarantee those words do not think what you think they mean. Regulated in this context means well armed.

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Can you name me the last war that America won against a committed population armed with small arms?

I can't. Because it's never happened.

view more: next ›