CraigOhMyEggoAlt

joined 4 months ago
[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -4 points 3 weeks ago

Oh. I read those all as different people. My bad.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're still going to try. Russia already has, and they're the home of Marxism-Leninism.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"Anti-AI troll" appears in more than just those two. That's shorthand for being concerned with copyright.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -2 points 3 weeks ago

It's 100% possible to block a website in one country that comes from another country. It doesn't affect the website in its own country, but it still prevents the website from being usable in the country that blocked it.

In the past, I too may have said he's probably not aware of the fediverse, but then a fediverse mod blew up a fertility clinic a few weeks ago. That at least puts us all on the far edges of the NSA's radar. Even Kiwi Farms has never produced any mass saboteurs.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The artist doesn't need to be an artist-for-profit for it to apply. They just need to be someone who can say they spent all day on an art piece. The incentive for that goes away when it amounts to something that other people can enjoy without any boundaries.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf 0 points 3 weeks ago

It's there in the fine print.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sometimes those rules reflect a personal choice. Sometimes they reflect ethics. And sometimes they are protecting themselves from the law.

Almost every instance has defederated from Burggit because its terms of service mention they will turn a blind eye to pedo content. Pedo content, quite obviously, is highly illegal (at least in the majority of first world nations), which shouldn't have to be mentioned to people. Nobody is applying that logic to Burggit.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

When a government blocks a website in a country, they do so by registering the website's name on a list of websites held by the internet providers. They can do this to any website federated with a certain website they want blocked until they're all blocked. They have blocked email providers before, if you want a rough model of how this would work.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I haven't used their platform for the very reason that I wouldn't follow their rule.

There is no “fediverse” to shut down.

Unless you're the government. The government has power over the internet providers.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -5 points 3 weeks ago

I counted way more than two communities. That's often said to mean it's an instance ban.

In case people missed it (I will assume good faith here), “anti-AI troll” is another way of saying “this person is concerned about copyright”.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's indeed what he said.

[–] CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtf -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

People would think that not remembering that copyright is more than just about the distribution.

 

And it seems karmacourt will be the first to posit that the fediverse is worth "putting in its place", going by the upvotes in such an empty community that probably discourages those kinds of suits.

 

This never made any sense to me whatsoever.

I've see all the physicists (Michio Kaku, Stephen Hawking, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, etc.) explain this principle but it doesn't make sense. They say that if you were to go to the moon and back at a certain speed near the speed of light, you might return to Earth a thousand years into the future like what happened in Planet of the Apes. But if you were going at the speed of light, you would arrive at the time light takes to arrive there. Why the dip? What is being missed?

 

Someone I know has been in a rough spot and I was asked by a friend of theirs to reach communities they cannot reach to help her help him garner some help, only to realize there are none. His mother recently died in Japan, forcing him to join college just to get away from his abusive dad, only for the death and his departure to throw the dad into a literally crippling depression forcing him to be his dad's care provider, which left him with a debt and now they hit some work issues. So far they've been living on ham and cheese sandwiches.

 

Someone on Reddit has been saying someone has been able to report new members without proof and remove their threads by claiming to be the people they've reported. Out of curiosity, I tested this out. Turns out it checks out. For some reason, admins have allowed it to be possible. I found out my threads have been removed this way, so beware if you're banned from somewhere or your threads are removed. This is the same person who thinks she can compete with Fedilore on Tumblr after being banned from Fedilore's instance for signing up for KiwiFarms in order to prevent her friends from being backbitten on there before going on YouTube to complain about it.

 

And what were the dumber lead-ups?

 

This is for those who know what "death of the author" means or who is willing to look it up, but in short, it can summed up to mean "whatever a work of fiction means is up to the people to decide on".

Question inspired by an incident the other day where I saw someone one day cite "death of the author" when asked why he went into the womens' bathroom, saying "you keep saying the symbol on the door is a stick figure in a dress, but I look at it and see a stick figure in a cape, and so I entered because I'm super."

 

One day I asked what someone’s relationship status was, and they said “I have a girlfriend but she’s been missing and is presumed dead, so I don’t know if getting another GF would be cheating”. It’s at that moment when I realized how complicated relationship statuses can get. Like that Seinfeld episode where the guy is in a coma so he lends his girlfriend to another guy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›