Yeah brother
CubitOom
I'm also using the lift. Although I don't do too many shooters, it did get me through cyberpunk 2077, elden ring, and armored core VI very well.
I'll also note that I have had no issues with Linux drivers on Arch.
Changelogs are published to stakeholders. So what I'm saying is you don't have to try to enforce a commit style using got hooks if you have public shaming at your disposal.
Reminds me of Mafia! (1998) where the guy is squeezing the oil out of olives by hand.
Because if you are creating a changelog automatically based on the commit messages it will be very public and that user will look bad.
https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/about/#tooling-for-conventional-commits
The language of love
There are a few reasons I can think of that Lemmy is a better platform than ticktock.
- ticktock uses an algorithm to drive engagement and keep users on the platform for as long as possible, recommending posts that it thinks the user will like or hate. Lemmy doesn't do this.
- I've never actually used ticktock so I'm not sure if it's possible to block content in the same way but the ability to block users, communities, and entire instances is I think one of Lemmy's best features.
- there are no ads on lemmy.
Now for the content in question, my understanding is that it's entirely user generated. Just like Lemmy, reddit, YouTube, Etc. It's not like the Chinese government is making American women film themselves dancing and then forcing them to post it on ticktock. That's just what that person wanted to make and post and ticktocks algorithm is recommending it.
With that being said, there are potentially useful, funny, or important content that might be uploaded to ticktock by a user, the same way that girl dancing video was. If that happened, wouldn't make sense to move that content to a platform without many of the down sides of the ticktock platform?
Wouldn't it be more like having your family owned restaurant cook dishes using user posted recipes from food.com?
It's user generated content in both analogies. It's still valid content no matter which platform it was originally posted too.
If a Lemmy user posts a ticktock video to Lemmy then how would it be different then a Lemmy user posting a YouTube video to Lemmy?
I just checked and apparently my 4 year old has taken out over 100 books from the library.
I took out like 10 in the same timeframe.
I'm not asking if any platform is better than Lemmy.
I'm asking if it would be good to facilitate the ability to post the user generated content from a terrible platform to Lemmy.
I offer a 6th option: Mike Wazowski
Open source and the self sufficiency of self hosting and running software locally are at the core of solarpunk.
The more llms are optimized in the future, the easier it will be to host and run on lower end hardware with less resources using upcycled hardware.
ollama is great for self hosting llms. It comes with several very useful ones that will work out of its box from its library. With a little bit of effort (creating a modelfile and adding a from line to point to the model's path) one can also run any openly available model if its in gguf format or one can take models found on huggingface and convert them to gguf format if they arn't already.