Its really something the white house published, but it's also a disinformation campaign to make trump look like he isn't an idio. It is also an attack on freedom of the press, scientific research, and on lgbqt+.
CubitOom
I'm glad he did, now there is a clear line from when it was acceptable to when it wasn't.
The USA probably won't rebrand when its a fully fascist state.
I have many well over 70000 hours.
At what point do you consider replacing a drive?
When I worked at a data center, I would notice drives would die around 50k hours. Some last a lot longer but when your testing hundreds of drives you start to see the patterns. So when my drive get to 50k I replace them preemptively just to not have data loss. I might still glue them km a redundant backup or something like that.
Why is partner more common than spouse? Is it because gay marriage was only recently legalized? I just find the word reminds me too much of business jargon and buddy cop movies.
I personally like my chosen one, cause then it's like we are in an epic quest together.
Yeah, you'd have to figure out how to define a "problem" first. It's a better IDE to define what metrics might indicate you need to replace soon before a problem actually happens.
You could just run it in a cron and have it tee to a file or even send an email report
That link above has a check list of sorts to help in the identification.
I was running the numbers in my head and realized that if hosting media like music and video files where it's just written to once and read from a lot, a large 2.5 inch SSD might be a better buy than a HDD (especially if size limited to a 2.5 inch HDD). My reasoning is that a HDD needs replacement after around 50,000 power on hours. But an SSD needs replacement depending on how often the entire drive is overwritten. For a media server that should mean that the HDD will be replaced much more often than an SSD. And that's without considering vibration related issues of having multiple drives in the same server or if you experience frequent power outages (both of which would make a better case for an ssd.
So what I do is I use an M.2 SSD for the OS, and the largest 2.5 sata SSD I can find which will fit my storage and backup solution. (recently bought 4x 8TB SSDs). For the m.2 drive, try to get the best value size as I've never heard anyone complain about having too big of a drive.
For all SSDs (m.2 and data) make sure that it accurately reports SMART data for you can keep tabs on their health metrics.
Can someone link this in some way that doesn't require a google sign in?
Btw, we're better than Google.
Thanks, just updated that formatting