DaSaw

joined 2 years ago
[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wind deniers?

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Always worried they’ll get shattered

Isn't that the point?

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that Hanford, CA? lol, I remember the drinking water problem there.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I just hope they eventually cast some fully Britishized actor originally out of Hong Kong... one trained in certain things Hong Kong actors are known for. I want a kung fu Doctor. :p

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

From the driver's seat of a semi, Colorado feels like bits and pieces of its neighboring states smooshed together. You got Utahrado, New Mexirado, Wyomirado, and, yes, Nebraskarado, which is probably where the Midwestern Coloradans live. The only part where I really feel like I'm in a distinct state is the high mountain forests that shoot down the middle of the state.

Denver is probably where it is because it's right at the intersection of quite a few of these biomes. I wouldn't be surprised to learn it's been a major trading center for about as long as humans have roamed the continent.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Coastal part is The South. Inland, you get Southwest. Then there's the panhandle, and while I don't know much about what the locals think of it, from the driver's seat of a semi it's indistinguishable from the flatter parts of Oklahoma. (Meanwhile, one of my favorite truck stops is in the hilly part of Oklahoma: the Chocktaw travel center in Stringtown.)

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Midwest" was once called "West". Like, Ohio was "The West", with "The West" meaning anything west the coastal plain.

Then people went even further west, but they still wanted to call the west of the past "West" so they called it "Middle West".

You kind of see the same thing in Asia. To Europe, Jerusalem was in "The East". Heck, even Constantinople was in "The East?" Then people saw just how much East there was. So... Middle East?

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Great Plains and Midwest are almost synonymous.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Our democracy is a great democracy the way an antique car is a great car: great in its time, but it's time for an upgrade.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

It's a shame smart people abandoned the Church. Romans makes it clear that Gentile Christians are not to be held to the Law of Moses, but that rather extensive part of Deuteronomy that deals with bodily fluids and rashes and stuff makes it equally clear that, even if we're not meant to follow those exact rules, basic sanitation and disease control is part of the unwritten Law of God. Coupled with the idea that all authority comes from God (not just their particular authority, as this was written at a time when Rome was still ruled by pagans with pretentions of personal godhood), a compelling argument could have been made that staying home, masking up, and getting the vaccine is what Jesus wants you to do.

But there is nobody left who is either able or willing to make that argument.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's interesting is how this contradicts Deuteronomy. In that, if a man has "a semenal emission", he is unclean, and must depart the camp until nightfall, at which point he must wash himself, his clothes, and his bedding with water, at which point he can re-enter. Deuteronomy basically says you have to leave any time you contact any kind of bodily fluid., with the only exception being the blood of a "clean" (kosher) animal that you know how it died. Roadkill: gotta stay outside until nightfall, and then clean up.

 

I feel like Crunchyroll used to have it, but I searched for it and couldn't find it. Myanimelist suggested HiDive might have it, but so far as I can tell it doesn't. Does nobody have it any more?

Also, how is Crunchyroll deciding what can be watched with free account and what requires premium? I got an urge to watch some Laid Back Camp, which came out many years ago at this point, and they're requiring premium for that? I went over a year not watching any anime, so I'm kind of out of the loop on the streaming scene.

 

I generally use "anarchist" to describe my political philosophy. I'm pretty sure I'm using it correctly, but I'm not certain. I haven't had much contact with other "anarchists", just a bit of exposure through history and such.

First off, to me, "anarchism" doesn't mean "no government". Rather it means "no intrinsic authority". What I see among historical anarchists is an opposition to practices that, frankly, aren't all that often practiced any more, in the political realm. I'm referring to rule by bloodline and such, nobility and royalty. I get the impression the early anarchists wanted to do away with royal governance, in favor of a federation of voluntary governments instituted at the local level. Which is to say, they believed in government; they just wanted to do away with imposed external authority.

But I do see our current economic relations as having a great deal of externally imposed authority in it... though going into my beliefs about why, and what could be done about it, would be beyond the scope of this essay.

To me, anarchism means the following:

  1. Favoring no unnecessary relationships of authority.

  2. Where authority is necessary, it should be granted by those over whom the authority is exercised, directly and individually, to the greatest extent practicable. So, for example, if we have an economic system that leaves both employers and employees with the same level of market power (we do not, but if we did), the employer-employee relationship would qualify, since it commences by choice of both parties, and can end by the choice of either party.

  3. Where this is impracticable, the authority in question should always be temporary, with a clearly delineated end. For example, the parent-child relationship is necessarily one of authority, since children lack the faculties to make all the decisions one needs to make. But this relationship should be premised on preparing the child to survive outside this relationship, and have a clear end point (the point of their majority). And I mainly include this but just for the parent-child relationship; I can't think of any others.

All this being said, I know there are those for whom Anarchism means "no government", usually detractors who don't actually understand the philosophy... or so I assume. Do I assume incorrectly? Is my use of the term wildly incorrect? I really don't know.

view more: next ›