Daryl

joined 1 month ago
[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

As in 'If you are progressive, do not read too much into that book."?

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

And here is me thinking that AI was a LEARNING thing.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Let's clarify some literary terms.

Sci-fi means Science Fiction, or general sciences particularly. Emphasis on the general sciences as a major element in the fiction. Soc-Com refers to Social Commentary. Emphasizes discussing or hypothesizing some element of Social Science as opposed to General Science. Soc-Fi refers to 'Social Science' Fiction, not to be confused with 'general science' Fiction. It is primarily Social Commentary fiction in a fictional setting, sometimes incidentally using some principles of general science manipulation in the setting.

Many people get these terms confused and intermingle them. Some books actually do cross over.

Ray Bradbury wrote a lot of really good Sci-Fi. He also wrote some good Soc-Com or Soc-Fi and many tried to pretend it was still Sci-Fi. Fahrenheit 451 for example, was good Soc-Fi. Not much 'Science' in it, but a whole lot of 'Social' in it.

When I was in high school the English department tried to convince me A Canticle for Leibowit was Sci-Fi and not Soc-Com or Soc-Fi. The science in it was horrible.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

That would explain it, then.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

Ahhh, I see most of the posts herein are showing the Americans a warm welcome. A really warm welcome. As in 'hope you fry in Hell' warmth.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The irony is, my account with TD goes way back to when my original account WAS with a Credit Union-type institution - Waterloo Trust, then Canada Trust, then TD.

https://images.ourontario.ca/waterloo/29847/data

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Typical signs of a Chatbot going insane.

Wait, was a Chatbot ever sane to begin with?

But really, Gravity's Rainbow? That was for readers that did not have a mind in the first place, so how could they lose it?

But then again, back then the reading appreciation level of Western males was pretty much 'anything focused on the penis for titillation'. That is, basic adolescent male penis-and-guns obsession.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 hours ago

Americans do not even TRY to understand Canadians.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Typical American obfuscation. Your posts are completely irrelevant to the topic. Only 'doom and gloom' I read in the article is the doom and gloom of America.

It is the ffinancialization of America - the concept that the American population can grow strong and prosperous by making money on money rather than by making things that has completely destroyed the economic foundation of the American working (formerly middle) economic level. Only those who are already rich can 'make' more money.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago

Hopefully, Canadians will have a LONG memory.

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 hours ago

The Americans are an adversarial us-vs-them society. There always has to be a loser in the American culture.

 

In other words, some Republican senators still want to insert the knife into Caanda, to drain our lifeblood, but they want it done compassionately.

 

Take that, America.

Never underestimate the strength of Canadian resolve in the face of enemy action.

 

The irony is, the only country that has EVER, in Canada's entire history as a nation, shown any intent or interest. either by word or deed, into attacking Canada is ... the United States of America.

No other country has even hinted, ever, that it wants to or will or is planning to attack Canada the Nation.

England and France had a tiff over who would control the land that would be called Canada, and both ended up having a partnership in the new Nation of Canada. After that, they showed no interest. Well, maybe a comment or two from Chuck DeGaul.

Not even in either of the two World Wars.

In fact, it was not until the mid 1940's that America proposed that Canada and the United States should be friends and partners in the military sense. Before that, we always had a healthy fear of the military intentions of America towards us.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogdensburg_Agreement

And here a slightly different bias

https://tbaw.ca/2024/05/08/the-ogdensburg-agreement-part-i-introduction/

 

Could THIS is the beginning of Canada finally standing o its own two feet in national Defense, after the Avro disaster? A home-grown defense industry using home-grown technology?

The public sentiment is ripe for this initiative to NOT be suppressed by American narcissism.

 

Dontcha just love it when Trump tries to tell CANADIANS what we want and don't want?

 

Rather than collapsing, the Canadian economy seems to be holding up quite well to the American fascist aggression.

Canada survives and prospers, America falters and their decline continues.

 

Another news article I am not sure what to make of. There are just so many levels of complexity to this.

Since the carbon tax comes off one time only, for a one time price reduction. and thus only offset price increases this time only, will we see inflation resuming its normal limb next report?

And will we see price reductions in the supermarket to reflect this? Or was in mainly gasoline for transportation and heating that led the offset?

 

Housing crisis? There ain't no stinkn' housing crisis.

There is, however, an 'overabundance of stupid' crisis.

 

Any excuse for Loblaws to raise their prices even higher than they have been.

 

Can anyone make sense of this article? Seems absolutely full of contradictions.

Trump threatens to increase imports of pharmaceuticals into America. Trump threatens increased tariffs on pharmaceuticals. Somehow, American pharmaceutical companies will export drugs cheaply to Canada and then import them back to America and sell them cheaper than they can sell the drugs kept back in America. The world is seemingly dependent on American pharmaceutical firms. India makes most of the world's generic drugs. Canadian drug plans are, by and large, really pushing for the substitution of generics for brand names for reimbursement purposes. Drugs are a lot cheaper in Canada. Somehow, Canada is supposed to import the drugs made in India through American channels, paying American tariffs, instead of directly from India. So Americans can buy them back cheaper than Canadians pay. The ''free enterprise' system, as exemplified by the American drug producers, will always result in the lower price. No American government, Republican or Democrat, has been remotely successful in bringing down American drug costs. There are too many rich people who can afford to pay absurdly high costs for drugs. The top 10% of American income earners is still equal to the entire population of Canada. That is a LOT of demand for drugs-at-any-cost. The Republican "Keep government out of private enterprise" party wants the American federal government to be more like our Canadian government in being able to regulate pharmaceutical profits and drug costs. Instead of wanting Canada to join America, several States want to join Canada when it comes to securing lower drug costs. Trump wants Canadians to pay more for drugs so Americans can get them cheaper. Somehow, wait for it, according to Trump's non-logic America is subsidizing the costs of drugs in the rest of the world, and 'The National Security of America' is at risk.

 

Have you noticed how many AMERICAN owed corporations are now claiming Canadian connections?

McDonalds is claiming Canadian ownership, because their franchises are owned by Canadians.

Lazyboy, which has no manufacturing or assembly n Canada, is claiming a 'buy Canadian' slant because the Lazyboy stores in Ontario are licensed to Canadian owners.

Even saw an add where ESSO is claiming Canadian roots, for over half a century.

Next, Walmart will be touting that it has Canadian roots.

 

For better or for worse, what better indicator is there that this government is defining itself to be very, very different than anything we have had before.

A complete break from the American state department.

Right up there with Canada and Cuban relations.

view more: next ›