They do give a clue as to a reason/excuse why not in the article:
Each [AI security] platform surfaces different vulnerabilities, making it difficult to establish a single, reliable source of truth for what is actually secure.
Also, they come up with so many false positives that it's a huge job to check over the reports for something usable.

Ah yes, the click of death. Given that, this but in the article made me laugh:
I guess Iomega quickly changed the name on that one.