Deebster

joined 2 years ago
[–] Deebster 1 points 6 months ago

I was just answering your question, but you're right, this is a waste of my time.

[–] Deebster 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So you had to go to a different page to take that screenshot since it's literally not on the linked article? Uh huh.

Also, you've misspelt dictionary and ignorant in your original post. Never mind.

[–] Deebster 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's also because we have better codecs like Opus. You're probably streaming Opus on YouTube along with many other sites.

[–] Deebster 1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

My dictionary (Chambers) says architect can be a verb:

transitive verb
To plan or design as an architect

As a verb, the gerund form seems fine, although I couldn't find it in context from the link. Where did you see this word? Maybe the downvotes are because you're lost/off topic.

[–] Deebster 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This, but (almost) not ironically, sums up !dull_mens_club@lemmy.world (which, for the record, I consider a good thing)

[–] Deebster 1 points 6 months ago

As soon as I saw the comic, I came to check that someone had posted this classic.

[–] Deebster 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The article is from Bitwarden, which is a password manager - using them you don't need to remember individual passwords (or type them, normally).

Bitwarden does have an option to use passphrases, I just tried it and it gave me washtub-moocher-dominoes.

[–] Deebster 14 points 6 months ago

What a charming emotional support shiv.

[–] Deebster 4 points 6 months ago

Toy Story 2? My other answer would be Godfather part II, but it's been so long since I saw it that I don't know if I agree with that commonly-held opinion.

[–] Deebster 5 points 6 months ago

The article talks about how plenty of sites say no to AI in their Ts & C's, but you need to block specific crawlers in robots.txt to have any effect:

terms of service are specific and nuanced, but not machine readable and robots.txt is machine readable, but incredibly coarse and unspecific

Surely if you're a company touting your LLM as the solution to all the world's problems, you can use your own product to comprehend that you're not allowed to scrape? Or, more importantly, surely content owners can convince a judge of that.

[–] Deebster 7 points 6 months ago

I bow to your local knowledge!

[–] Deebster 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

One of the sources is News.com.au which seems legitimate enough.

Edit: or not! That's what you get for checking MBFC

view more: ‹ prev next ›