DelightfullyDivisive

joined 10 months ago
MODERATOR OF
CCW
[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No question that banning guns reduces all of those things. In Germany it also made it easier to round up Jews, homosexuals and other undesirables in the middle of the last century. I don't think that human nature has changed since then. Is civilian gun ownership the only thing preventing similar behavior in the US? Or is it irrelevant as I infer that you believe? I don't think that there is a definitive answer.

There is merit in many of the different points of view on the subject. Unfortunately, most arguments around gun ownership and bans are fear-based. That makes rational discussion very difficult. It also makes it easy to demonize people who don't agree with you.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I noticed that you aren't arguing with the "idiots" part. We have a lot more than a handful of those...

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I wish that was the case here (Michigan, USA). We have had two in recent memory.

What are your thoughts on firearms ownership in the US, given what has happened to our government lately? Do you see merit in the idea of civilian ownership of small arms in our current circumstances?

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Avi Loeb is a crank. He is not taken seriously by any real scientists. He decided to sell his scientific integrity years ago.

Based on my deep knowledge of the methamphetamine trade (which comes entirely from watching "Breaking Bad" ), I'm sure you're right.

That is an interesting and I think very valid point.

Many people here in the US have absorbed decades of messaging from various war on drugs campaigns that imply anything not manufactured by a drug company his toxic. There's also been a lot of messaging that self-medicating is only for losers. I think there is a large grain of truth around the concept of self-medicating, but the stigma attached to mental health issues makes it difficult for a lot of people to seek out the help they need.

I am quite familiar with the effects as well. 🙂 Nonetheless, it did sound like several people were discussing marijuana in particular and claimed that a low dose would help them focus. That's certainly would not work for me.

That depends on the admins of a particular community, I think. In this case it was just strongly implied by a couple of people making comments that they would be banned if they mentioned whatever the drug was.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Based on all of the comments here, I'm pretty sure they were talking about meth. I never knew that it was actually sold as an ADHD med.

I guess that explains why the Reddit mods ban discussion of it, though. People can be so desperate for a "cure" that they'd risk it. I know what an idiot I was about drugs when I was a teen and early twenty-something.

I don't find caffeine effective for ADHD, but amphetamine (Adderall) is. It is quite likely that the mechanism of action for methamphetamine is much more like other amphetamine formulations.

That said, I'm not even sure if they were talking about meth or something else.

 

I came across a post on Reddit where a commenter implied they were using non-prescription drugs to manage their ADHD when they couldn't get a stimulant prescription for whatever reason.

Nobody would name the drug(s) for fear of being banned. From context it seemed some people were talking about a stimulant, and others marijuana. What might the stimulant be? Meth? If so, how would you dose that, and would it actually work?

I'm just curious, not intending to try it myself. I can get a prescription easily enough, and I have no desire to put myself in legal jeopardy. I am wondering if the meth version of amphetamine would work better, about the same, or not as well, though. I don't know the effects first-hand, but if it's anything like cocaine (I was an adult in the late 80s when coke was more popular), it doesn't seem like it would be helpful.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Atomoxitine for the past few years. Recently I have tried modafinil to supplement it. It's like a lightweight version of stimulants. I find that I don't need a normal 100 mg dose for it to work. 50 mg is enough, and I think even 25 mg it has a noticeable effect.

I am experimenting with Adderall on one or two days per week, then modafinil for 2-3 more, with atomoxitine everyday. (I basically supplement my strattera Monday through thursday, and occasionally on a Friday to make work easier.) This seems like a really useful combination to me so far, and with this dosing schedule, it seems like it will take a very long time for me to build up a tolerance, if I ever do.

I love my prescriber. He knows that I am fairly cautious about medications, so he is willing to prescribe different things over time to see what works best.

After decades of trying to find the perfect system, I settled on a searchable notes app (I use Joplin) to dump in everything, and a mind mapping app (I use Xmind) as a day to day log. I keep regular journal entries in Joplin, and anything from Xmind that I want to be able to find later I just copy-paste into a Joplin note. (You can copy a Mmap node, then when you paste it will dump a text outline in.)

 

This is one of the problems I have with accuracy. I tend to shoot low and left, but only after the first round. This video was helpful, as were others from the same shooting coach.

I usually carry a 632 UC, which is a revolver chambered in 32 H&R Magnum. It has very little recoil, so I can shoot a bit faster and more accurately. I'd really like to shoot my 9mm guns better (9mm is MUCH cheaper), but it has been a challenge. What put me on the road to improvement was an understanding that several different issues are in play on every shot.

This video talks about managing the trigger press. The other things that I struggle with are grip pressure (putting pressure in the right place instead of tiring out my hands after one box of ammo), and proper tension in my wrists (so the sights snap back on target without bouncing around).

The key for me has been to slow down. I find that if I concentrate more and take my time, I can do most of the things some of the time. Apparently, more focused practice is better. Who knew? 🙂

 

I do like Chris Baker's gun-nerd take on things. In this case, I was trying to figure out why my guns all seem to move around in my hands when I'm shooting, causing me to take extra time to re-aim after each shot. In contrast, most of the people in pistol-related videos have their sights snap right back on target.

This blog explains some of the mechanics of recoil with different designs.

 

I have an optic on my Shield Plus that I don't shoot as well as the sights on my S&W 632. At the range, that is.

I carry it anyway because I need reading glasses to see any detail within 2 yards or so. The red dot works whether I have glasses on or not. Even high-vis iron sights are really hard to pick up against a bright background.

Has anyone else with older eyeballs found that a red dot helps? If not, if suggest giving it a try.

 
 

I was a bit skeptical of this idea, but I actually bought a Smith & Wesson 632 UC. Now I think the author of this blog post and video is right.

I carry it loaded with 32 h&r mag. This has noticeably lighter recoil than a 38 special in such a small gun, but it's very manageable. More importantly, ballistics are comparable to a 38 special out of a snubby. At the range, the gun is actually fun to shoot when I load it with 32 Smith & Wesson longs. I also tried some 32 shorts in it, and recoil is like a 22: Virtually non-existent. 32 short is pretty hard to find, though, and the only brand that I found was Magtech. Unfortunately, Magtech has a reputation for having a high number of dud primers, which has been my experience.

The 32 longs have very light recoil in any case, so I've just been sticking with those at the range. I have also watched the price for all .32s drop noticeably in the past couple of months. It isn't cheap, but it's cheaper to shoot then a number of other calibers that were popular 25 years ago.

Finally, I picked up a couple of HKS speed loaders from Midway USA. They were less than 10 bucks each, and although it isn't nearly as fast as reloading a semi-auto, it is doable in two or three seconds. A speed strip takes more like 10 seconds for me. More to the point, a speed loader in this caliber doesn't make a ridiculously large bulge in my pocket.

2
New community for CCW (discuss.online)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online to c/newcommunities@lemmy.world
 

a.k.a. !ccw@discuss.online

I just created this group on a different server. Reasons why are in the sidebar & first post. Please stop by and share your thoughts!

1
My EDCs (infosec.pub)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online to c/CCW@discuss.online
 

These are the two that I carry most often. Both are Smith & Wessons. I am still trying to get used to the optical sight on the Shield Plus, so I usually have the 632 UC on.

I carry AIWB at around 1:00 for either of them. I find it comfortable for all day, though the revolver is a bit more comfortable.

Holsters are a Philster "City Special" (for the revolver), and a Harry's Holsters "Shorty" for the 9mm. I replaced the grip on the 632 with an Altamont wood grip - the one it came with did not fit my hand well at all. The Shield Plus is wearing a Hogue grip sleeve because it also didn't fit my hand well. I have very large hands (more long than wide), so most good CCW guns need something to improve the grip for me.

 

There are other CCW forums on Lemmy, but none on discuss.online, which is a US-based Lemmy instance. Since the US has the most permissive concealed-carry laws for the largest number of people, it seemed like a better instance for a group like this than lemmy.world, which is hosted in the EU AFAIK.

I would really like this group to avoid politics-based argument. I'm happy to add links in the sidebar to groups that encourage this, though - please just contact me to add one. I don't want to be too specific about that that means, but if it gets too noisy or rude I'll ask people to take it to a more appropriate forum.

I'm a regular reader of the /r/CCW forum on reddit (liked in the sidebar). I created this one because:

  • I think we need a backup, in case Reddit shuts it down for any reason
  • Lemmy is a better experience, without a bunch of ads always in your face
  • There already were a couple of CCW groups on other instances, but nothing on the largest US-based instance (which is this one), so I know there is some interest in the subject here

I'll get things going with a couple of other posts shortly, and pimp this group in the appropriate places on Lemmy. I'm not sure about promoting it on reddit (I suspect that Reddit polices any Lemmy links) - I'll ask the /r/CCW mods what they're comfortable with, if anythting.

view more: next ›