Fifrok

OH! Finally! A chance to use my knowledge acquired from scrolling wikipedia while procrastinating! That law hasn't been overturned and is still, well, law. Of course every once in a while some clueless cop (because why should somebody enforcing the law, know the law sigh) will ask a topless sunbather to cover up. Here's the article.

Governments get to decide what speech is illegal these days, and do so to push their agenda.

That has always been the case, pick any time in any goverment and you will find that. That's just how goverments work.

things that the far left don’t like so call “far right hate speech” to censor it and push their desired narrative

Please, do tell, where is this place that has a 'far left' with enough power to that? Not germany, CDU is in power right now and they are center-right, left-wing (but not far-left) Die Linke has got around 8-9% of votes in the last election. There is not a single european country that has a far-left party in power. The biggest far-left organisation in my area is food-not-bombs (pl. jedzenie zamiast bomb) but I think they would have a hard time trying to censor anything, considering that the only thing they do is give meals for people in need.

I mean this with the biggest offence possible: AI judges make no sense, atleast with the current way of doing AI (LLMs). It's been known for years that they amplify any bias in their training data. You are black? Higher chance of going to prison and longer serving time. Getting divorced and are male? Your ass is NOT getting custody. Hell, even without that the LLM might just hallucinate some crime not in the data for a case and give you a life time prison sentence. And if you somehow manage to avoid all that, what's stopping somebody from just shadowprompting it and getting the judgement they want? It would also be an easy target for corruption, the goverment wants their poltical rivals gone? Tweak the model so it's just that bit harsher, or just a bit more alligned with some other interpretatnion of the law.

Who would even choose the training data? The judges? Why would they, it would be better for them to sabotage and keep their jobs. Some goverment agency then? Don't want to do that, or you're gonna find out separation of power has a reason.

Bad idea.

You really want to give any power over yourself and others to the bias amplification machine?

Sure, but the health impact of a modern laser printer is on par with other daily health hazards at worst. Modern toner shouldn't contain anything dangerous, nanoparticles could be a problem depending on amount of printing and the printer model, but if you live in a city you will breathe in more by opening a window. Ozone is emmited during printing but in small enough amounts that it will be problematic only in a small room with shit ventilation and tons of printing, and I mean tons, atleast a couple of books worth.

1. wyglądają jak zjeby

Chodziło mi że wyglądają jak dzieci

2. kilka takich nastolatek ruchałem

Tu masz linka od którego możesz zacząć szukanie informacji o leczeniu

3. będziesz pisać smutne historie po internetach

To nie ja zrobiłem alt konto żeby pisać po banie xd

4. czcić staśko

idk kto to

Zgłaszam wpis za mowę nienawiści

Okej xd. Twój zgłaszam za namowę do pedofilii xd. W przedziale 18-21 są dwa lata które można nazwać nastoletnimi. Nastolatki to wiek 11-19. Przepisy przepisami ale jak myślisz że ktoś w okolicy wieku 15 jest gotowy na bycie rodzicem to polecam się od internetu oderwać i po ulicy rozejrzeć jak wyglądają ludzie w tym wieku.

Nastolatki powinny się zajmować rodzeniem? Ciebie człowieku pojebało?

Idk where you got all that from, that's not meant as a argument and I'm not gonna argue with you

I'm saying you sound like an obedient little sub for a right wing con man

this is how you sound when you say "average testosterone levels are lower and sperm counts are way lower"

common Starmer L

I caught myself writing a long response to this, but I got something that I belive will be better: Ok, USAmerican.