Sure does! But nothing will happen, you're essentially a 100% safe running pump and dump schemes as long as you only rip off poor people.
Check out Coffeezilla's yt channel, there's loads of obvious fraudsters out there, nothing ever happens to them.
Gute Frage. Bürger erpressen, damit sie auf ihre Rechte verzichten klingt zwar nicht legal, aber wer weiß...
Deutsche Bahn tried it with that reasoning. They're currently being sued by digitalcourage.org and I'm confident they'll lose.
Well, the authorities may be sluggish at best, but still your stance on this seems rather uninformed.
You should read up on noyb.eu 's work, and the lawsuits they fought. The max. fines for GDPR-violations is 4% of a company's worldwide annual turnover, that's something companies are taking very seriously, I know because I deal with it on a daily basis.
There's still going to be companies who try to bend the law to their will, but they keep losing in front of courts.
Ja man ist doch immer wieder überrascht, wie schwer manchen das Denken fällt
Also die Statistik hab ich so nicht mal ansatzweise beobachtet. Alle Altersgruppen, alle Geschlechter. Fix verbaut, am Lenker montiert, Lastenrad, alles dabei.
Sensibilisierung wär tatsächlich wichtig, ich hab nicht das Gefühl, dass da wer absichtlich blendet.
Wenn sie eher locker sind kann man sie während der Fahrt gut einstellen.
It isn't. Just as declaring yourself a sovereign citizen isn't a loophole for whatever idiots claim it's a loophole for, declaring illegitimate use legitimate isn't a loophole.
Actual examples for legitimate use: Storing someone's address if he wants to send you something, using someone's IP-address to serve him data while he's on your site.... If it's necessary it's legitimate.
Deutsche Bahn is being sued right now just because of this, here's the initiative that is suing them: https://digitalcourage.de/
Send a few bucks their way instead of spreading false information on the Internet.
Tis is not not ok, actually. I'm a software dev for a European company. I'm briefed by our lawyers.
"Legitimate use" isn't just a phrase from cookie law, it has a very specific meaning.
What's legitimate use? Well, any data I necessarily have to store for our business relation I can store. For as long as I need it. For example: You want me to send you something? Gonna need to store your address. After I sent the package I don't have any need for your address any more so I'd need your explicit consent to store it longer.
Another example for what is considered personal data: IP addresses. Which I store for as long as you watch my site, so that would be another example for a legitimate reason to store personal data.
Still I don't get why they display this banner. To my knowledge it's not necessary to inform the user about storage for legitimate reasons.
All that said, there's plenty of examples of companies illegitimately storing personal data, google is a good example they were sued only yesterday (fitbit)
Ja - die Politik ist halt auch durch den grünen Koalitionspartner geprägt. Die Kommunisten glänzen durch soziales Engagement (die Bürgermeisterin behält von ihrem Gehalt nur einen Bruchteil - genaueres bitte selbst googeln, kann sogar sein dass das für alle Gemeinderäte gilt), was Menschen mit Kompetenz angeht, ist die Besetzung halt ein wenig dünn.
Nach Jahrzehnten, in denen der ÖVP-Bürgermeister hauptsächlich befreundete Bauunternehmer subventioniert und Graz damit finanziell enorm belastet hat eine willkommene Abwechslung.
I only ever use those sites if i really disliked a movie but can't figure out why.
As a way to select a movie they're really pointless, I think a system that matches tastes of people and recommends movies based on that would be more promising.