HumanPenguin

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 12 hours ago

While the fetish freak is lacking any valid opinion. Responding to evolutionary developed will to procreate is the opposite of a fetish.

In 2025 raising children to avoid loneliness. Is pretty close to slavery. We literally had a history in the west. Of the youngest daughter only existing to care for parents as they aged and died. And modern refusal to support elderly care. Really is society trying to enslave the young into responsibility for their parents over taxing the wealthier to provide such care.

Honestly the choice of parenthood should be left to those that feel most able to dedicate a significant portion of their lives to raising future citizens. While avoiding shaming those who feel less able into feeling forced to raise children.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)

Well UK renationalisation is happening. Or pretty darn close to it.

We will see news like this again and again. As all the rail contracts come up for renewal. Labour plans to either nationalised or accept community coop like bids.

Expectation is all will be moved by 2027.

Honestly. It is more interesting how little of this plan is commented on in the news like this.

It was in the manifesto. And Starmer has confirmed it multiple times in parliament.

Yet we keep seeing articles talking about single company changes. And a few about accepted coops. Yet no talk about the long-term plan. Given how popular the calls for renationalisation is. It looks a little questionable that the media seems to be minimising the one left leaning thing labour is doing.

Little odd the call this the first. At least 2 other private contacts have been in the news as moved to GBR when they expire. Plus at least 2 community groups accepted as bids.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago

Well, their own reports are pretty damning: The Commission’s response to fraud in the Common Agricultural Policy There’s a “Conclusions and recommendations” section that’s quite illuminating.

Taken separately. Because a few mins thought about recent UK history shows how fucked up giving the UK GOV More power to solve this is.

The UK GOV is currently attacking UK disabled benefits. Dispute multiple of their own reports stating it is against both UK law and ECHR laws.

Refusing to release Thier own investigation into the cause of multiple disabled suisides from victims of the gives changes to disability benefits,

If lack of response to recommendations is reason to leave the EU. Honestly you need to buy a boat renounce your citizenship of any nation. Because national governments you wish to give more power to are far far worse.

Guess why billionaires funded Brexit?

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago

Note how that is nations. And folks have been arrested.

So your evidence boils down to you blame criminals on the folks making the laws.

It's logically like saying if we get rid of murder. We don't have murderers.

Boris johnson broke the law during COVID. He also broke parliamentary procedure and the law. When he closed parliament and lied to the queen. To try and force through a Brexit deal he lack both parliamentary support for and the national mandate.

Non of that means the UK is corrupt. It means a subset Brexit supporters are.

Closing parliament because some MPs break the laws parliament creates. Is just removing the laws. Not solving curruption.

You are proposing the same solution to the EU. And if Italy did the same. They would be giving the power to the very people that broke those laws. Much as brexiters did giving power to the billionaires that funded the campaign.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Just to point out. The new UK replacement to the farming subsidiary. Also now works specifically to prevent land from growing food.

ATM for very good reasons.

But getting shit wrong is not curruption.

And the shit you saw with the EU. Is really just evidence on how open they are. You talk about the moving of seats. But know exactly why is happened. While the curruption in the UK government is real and often well hidden.

This was my whole issue with brexiters. The EU was blamed as an block independent of the nations. For shit our own leaders were constantly pushing through the EU.

Almost everything brexiters decried the EU for was shit the UK supported and often created. Yet the call was to give more power to the much less democratic processes in the UK.

Then to watch a minority that supported hard brexit. Instantly use our own less democratic first past the post bullshit. To override the waste majority and all the promises made by the Brexit crowd during the referendum.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago

"Fed up of experts"

Sums the whole thing up.

Not we question experts. Or even why are they experts. All valid questions that can be resolved one way or another.

But instead a call to glory in their own ignorance.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

Hence why I said. Warn folks about the error..

If someone sees a don't eat warning. They will also see a potential allergy warning or contains fish warning. In. The same place.

So informing people of the error and refunding any returns. Is no more risk then the initial sale was. And also produces a little less food and packaging waste then this.

So save n humans. Or save the same number if humans plus kill the earth less.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes I am. Based on a whole history of treaty talks since Brexit where the whole topic was based on trading standards and how alignment was why we could not join the customs union.

Expecting a fucking news article to teach you the topics you seem to have missed. Is expecting ELI5

And you you did suggest a meaning, when you openly interpreted the article as a good benefit of Brexit. And stated that it said nothing about domestic food standards.

You were specifically claiming we had some form of double standard that applies to food we export and food we don't.

Nothing in the article claims that. And I can assure you we as a nation do not. So you invested that meaning to make your rather pathetic point about the deal matching some Brexit benefit.

I made a very clear pretty close to ELI5 maybe 10. Of why I and the other poster was able to interpret the "aligned to EU standards" as relating to domestic sales. Based entirely on facts differing news have covered in detail while May and Bojo were negotiating.

Your failure to understand such simple points. Is likely why you voted Brexit.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Your need for an ELI5 is not my issue.

It's not a confusion. Our standards are what we require folks to sell food in the UK. If our standards and the EU are aligned. You have to be pretty fucking stupid to keep insisting that dose not relate to domestic sales.

What the fuck else do you think standards aligned actually means.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Labour have not been in power for 4 years. Less then 1.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Pay your taxes and we may have reason to support your AI needs.

Otherwise fuck the hell off and solve your own inferstructure needs. Or maybe ask the nations you register your shitty tax avoidance plans in to build then.

 

My opinion:

Telegraph just dosent get it. No one pays tax on savings.

Yeah they get it they just intentionally mislead in the title. Tax is paid on the income savings earn. Not your savings.

But the Telegraph has no interest in arguing why those who can afford to save should get that extra income tax free. When they know full well it helps the economy more when it is spent or invested in other ways.

Putting money into savings only helps the bank. It is safer for the saver. But only to a very limited point the best investment for them.

This is why ISA have always had limited maximums and often encourage investment with some risk. Rather then supporting a tax free passive income alone.

Any form of passive income can only be beneficial to a society as a whole. If the recipient is encouraging growth in the form of income for the rest of society iE jobs/inferstructure/or risk based investments. (At least assuming we stick to fiat based currency. )

 

Opinion:

Please bear with, this may get long. I tend to post then tidy when I have had a few option to reread. It's just how my mind works best. I am also visually impaired so miss errors. Please feel free to point any out.


The DWP currently estimates there are 16.1 million people in the UK considered disabled in some way. 24% of the population.

However accurate that number may be. When you add friends. family and supporters. It is more than enough people to be an electoral force.

So the big question I feel the need to ask. Why the hell do the 2 main parties suddenly feel so free to attack this community. Because to be clear here, the last 14 years have definitely been an attack on the disabled community. While despite a number of Labour MPs complaining. Labours leadership seems happy to blame all the economic woes of the UK on our community.

I am not going to get too politically biased here. But for info I am more left wing then current labour leadership, Likely a little less so the Corbyn was.

But this is really no longer a left vs right issue. As in the current UK FPTP system, no left off-centre party has any ability to stand up for us.

The issue is very like any other single issue political problem. Any voters will be divided across other issues. So as long as no one side stands up for the issue above all else. No party has much to lose by ignoring our issues.

But single issue parties have managed to influence the main parties. Simple, by threatening their votes rather than actually winning seats. The most prime examples are UKIP and the Green Party. Neither party managed to get a huge % of voters to support them. Less so in any dense enough area to create enough MPS to have any power. But however much you may like their politics or not. They were able to move enough votes from the main parties to worry them into support for the cause.

So here is a proposal I'd like to hear people's views on.

Is it time for the "Disability Rights UK" Party to form.

Honestly, this is just the start of an idea. And the name is no more than a suggestion.

I in no way expect this party to ever win 325+ MPs, and if it somehow did. I'd suggest we have a declared plan to join the 2nd party to implement the manifesto we come up with. And then call a new election. I personally do not think any single issue party can truly run a nation alone.

I think the more likely event is we can use our approx 16m potential supporters and convince them voting for us across the nation will slowly force the main parties to take our issues, needs, support and input to society seriously. Force them to realise we have an option to come together and force them to pay attention. Rather, than use us as some invisible enemy they can use to satisfy their own needs.

9
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/askuk@feddit.uk
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/25880686

If a federated community like this already exists, please point me to it. I'd rather not divide the effort any more than necessary.

I think it is clear to anyone in the UK. The disabled community is now under attack.

This community is an attempt to help pull people together and consider ideas for support and to enhance our voice.

I like many others in our community over the last 14 years. Have enough mental health issues. That I'd be grateful for other mod volunteers who will share the time managing the group. In the hope, we can keep the workload of off to few people.

11
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/feddituk@feddit.uk
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/25880686

If a federated community like this already exists, please point me to it. I'd rather not divide the effort any more than necessary.

I think it is clear to anyone in the UK. The disabled community is now under attack.

This community is an attempt to help pull people together and consider ideas for support and to enhance our voice.

I like many others in our community over the last 14 years. Have enough mental health issues. That I'd be grateful for other mod volunteers who will share the time managing the group. In the hope, we can keep the workload of off to few people.

https://feddit.uk/c/disabilityUK

13
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/25880686

If a federated community like this already exists, please point me to it. I'd rather not divide the effort any more than necessary.

I think it is clear to anyone in the UK. The disabled community is now under attack.

This community is an attempt to help pull people together and consider ideas for support and to enhance our voice.

I like many others in our community over the last 14 years. Have enough mental health issues. That I'd be grateful for other mod volunteers who will share the time managing the group. In the hope, we can keep the workload of off to few people.

https://feddit.uk/c/disabilityUK

22
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/casualuk@feddit.uk
 

If a federated community like this already exists, please point me to it. I'd rather not divide the effort any more than necessary.

I think it is clear to anyone in the UK. The disabled community is now under attack.

This community is an attempt to help pull people together and consider ideas for support and to enhance our voice.

I like many others in our community over the last 14 years. Have enough mental health issues. That I'd be grateful for other mod volunteers who will share the time managing the group. In the hope, we can keep the workload of off to few people.

https://feddit.uk/c/disabilityUK

32
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world
 

EDIT: Update and pic in comments:

Hey folks. I posted a while back asking for some advice on a future purchase.

To sum up. My brother and I are visually impaired and retired through that.

We have purchased a tiny 25ft narrowboat between us we use to travel around the UK.

And as our vision is getting worse (we will likely lose it eventually). I have some major electrical work planed this year to make thing easy for us to maintain.

So I was looking for advice on nylon printing. Yep it has to be nylon. Because some of this stuff needs to sit over the tiny hot engine plus alternator and survive diesel splashes amd bilge water etc while supporting electronics.

But some here also pointed out petg will work when. The heat is less high. So thanks.

This is just an update that i have just had the printer etc delivered.

I have a Neptune 4 pro with a tent and vent system to keep temprature and fumes safe stable.

I have a 70c filament dryer and plan to print Descicant hokder to be placed in spools with lids that hold hydrometers. This and some vacuum bags should allow storing the petg and nylon easyer. Then Microwaving the stuff when the meters are above 25%

Also those desicant holders look worth adapting somehow for the boat.

So now I need to replan my workshop to make setting all this up and using it easy vision wise. That will take a good few days.

This is basically a thank you for your help in the past and a "Hi ill be posting the mess I make learning how to get this workjng over the next few months. "

Thanks guys all the best

view more: next ›