Nyarlathotep7

joined 4 years ago
 

Hi everyone, been unemployed and finally got a job. I'm pretty much out of gas after using my last 7$ this morning. I got food covered (have a nice community food pantry). If someone could please help with just 15-20$, just trying to coast till my first paycheck. Thank you everyone.

Cashapp- $Nyarla7

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

There's lots of ballrooms where I'm at that do waltz, swing, and Latin dances. Dance studios usually have a night dedicated to social dancing.

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

? Why are you pointlessly being an asshole?

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

The Young Lords tried doing something called "revolutionary machismo" and that was deemed as a failure strategy-wise.

Although gratified that the party had thought to include gender at all, the Women’s Caucus began to question this point, arguing that “revolutionary machismo” was a non-sequitor, or even an oxymoron, designed to keep gendered hierarchy intact. As Morales writes, one woman pointed out that “It’s like revolutionary racism. It just doesn’t make sense.”

At one of their first meetings, caucus members conducted a close reading of the 13-point program. When they came to point 10, the women laughed. It was obvious to them that this document was written by men. The idea of positive machismo made no sense. The word machismo implied aggression towards women. This work resulted in a “YLP Position Paper on Women.” It was published as a special insert in the September 25, 1970 issue of the Young Lords bilingual newspaper, Palante. Following the position paper, the leadership revised the 13-point program. The point on women was moved from point 10 to point 5. Machismo was no longer revolutionary. Instead, the Young Lords declared “Down with Machismo!”

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imagine hearing someone talk like this in irl...blindly screeching tankie as if anyone gives af

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you all so much for your concise explanations, it is incredibly helpful. @Maoo@hexbear.net I especially appreciate your clarification on the relative surplus population. I should really get around to reading Capital.

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

Can't read this rn as I'm busy at work, but thank you for the indepth response. Will respond again once I can properly read it.

 

I get the general notion of what it's saying but I also feel entirely confused. Could someone explain it to me please?

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I'm honestly still in shock that we haven't seen Hezbollah engage with Israeli. This is the weakest it's ever been, how is this not the time to strike?

[–] Nyarlathotep7@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)
 

Not just censorship, but looking at what happened with Tarkovsky, being exiled for simply not returning to the USSR. I know Hollywood did the same at the time regarding film 'guidelines', I'm just curious if there's more context to the USSR's rather strict attitude with film? Or is this just western propaganda I'm swallowing?