Pika

joined 2 years ago
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

You mean its if and switch statements? For and while loops? Just like bash and zsh has?

No i mean the flow in general. It's ugly and not transparent when compared to bash or any other language

the lack of indication where it starts to where it ends

Yes and no, I mean how it chooses to start and end, there is no punctuation, it seems to emulate a tab oriented language without being a tab oriented language.

Piping something "via the function layout"? I'm not even sure what that means. I'd love to know more if you would.

Two separate complaints, I dislike how they manage functions (but yes bash does similar on this case). Piping and redirecting are badly implemented and what would be an accepted pipe in ZSH or Bash will fail in fish. I made a script that had to pipe a file via wget and it wouldn't function unless I used a pager which wasn't needed in Bash or Zsh and wasn't documented as a requirement anywhere on their piping or redirection documentation. Took me almost an hour of troubleshooting why the command was failing and how to fix it due to it.

I mean... It took me like an hour to read through the documentation, and all the syntax is so small you can memorize the entire language.

Maybe this has changed since I last tried about a year or two ago, but last time I tried to read the documentation it sucked hardcore and lacked examples of more advanced parts of the shell.

It kind of sounds like you were fighting fish rather than it fighting you, every step of the way. That sounds absolutely crazy compared to my experience.

I would rather take the path of least resistance for a program, with fish it had way too much resistance trying to use it, so I went to the path that had a lesser resistance, which was ZSH, and then just proceeded to add fish's core capabilities to zsh. This let me use a scripting language that has a lot of documentation and examples to assist in learning, while having the benefits of the shell. Plus it lets me actually share the scripts with friends because it's already hard to find someone on linux, and its even moreso difficult to find someone who uses fish shell.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I've never rebuilt a container, but I also don't have any containers that are deprecated status either. I swap off to alternatives when a project hits deprecation or abandonware status.

My only deprecated container I currently have is filebrowser, I'm still seeking alternatives and have been for awhile now but strangely enough it doesn't seem there are many web UI file management containers.

As such though ever since I learned that the project was ~~abandoned~~ on life support(the maintainer has said they are doing security patches only, and that while they are doing more on the project currently, that could change), the container remains off, only activating it when i need to use it.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

I just played it, it was super cool concept! I died due to cold but, the enviroment felt really good. I spent most of the time just aimlessly wandering. My only complaint was that the game bogged itself down when toggling the lantern on and off but thats probally an issue on my end! Tell them well done for me 😸

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I dislike heavily how flow control works on it, and the lack of indication where it starts to where it ends, the function layout, not to mention attempting to pipe anything via it. This combined with the fact that it's a lesser used shell and as such has less of a presence online to research made it not worth the time and effort to actually use it. I swapped to ZSH which at least maintains a large POSIX compliance which makes it easier to share the scripts as well and also supports adding many of fish's features.

It may be nicer to read but, actually getting established, learning it, using it and then maintaining compatibility with other programs and scripts when using it, just made it not worth it. I have better things to do with my free time then to try and fight a shell every step of the way to make it look cleaner.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago

Finally, a bed for people who toss and turn every night. 😂

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that was what I was saying it wasn't super clear. I was saying, just keep your scripts in Bash because it has better compatibility 👀

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

oh for sure, it made sense that they wanted to make sure was fixed. Just was super alarming the speed it was advertised that the relay was there!

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

reminds me of my first mail server, accidentally set up an open relay and got a lot of abuse reports from mail providers saying they blocked my server due to it. Took forever to get fixed again.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think my biggest issue with it is, it definitely seems like they made the bonus as part of the acquisition deal to obtain the company, with no expectation to actually follow through with the bonus. I dislike companies being able to bully smaller companies out of what they were entitled to.

I don't care that the founders aren't getting the money so to speak, I disagree with the corporate bullying of a larger entity absorbing/acquiring a smaller entity and then not even going through with their end of the deal.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Everything is hearsay at the moment, the testimony isn't public from what I've found, but there's multiple pages stating that the notes of the testimony stated the CEO has admitted that AI was used for general knowledge and then they deleted the conversations afterwards and as such couldn't obtain them anymore. Being as all models store it server side, I expect that if they did a legal notice to Chat-GPT or something they could likely retrieve it, but that would require going through the proper process.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I haden't seen that they had extended the milestone to 2026, so that's good on Krafton (even if they are removing most of the cost due to the founders portion of the bonus in the process). The issue i see still is, Subnautica pioneered the EA field. It was expected to release fairly barebones, thats how Subnautica 1 released when it went EA. Thats how below zero released when it went EA. The leaked milestone reports show a very optimistic view of what S2 should be when released, and then they revisited it to scale it back down to realistic expectations, then when revisited they said the new goals would be seen as bad PR to the user field and would recommend postponing release so they could upgrade the content available (both goalposts listed in the leaked milestone images). It sounds more like what the founders are claiming, that Krafton is trying to delay the game to avoid the primary payout, and that they are using the excuse that users would be critical of an EA as a reason.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It's something on your end, I just VPN'd through both Fortaleza and Sao Paulo and both can load Weebly just fine

view more: next ›