How does this compare against quik? https://f-droid.org/packages/dev.octoshrimpy.quik
ProbablyBaysean
And so after consuming the icy yet sticky popsicle, I looked for a trashcan, and there was none. So I walked along the block and I found evidence of trash cans that were filled in a bygone era. I could technically use them, but the wrapper would gain new life and blow through the population like a butterfly on the wind. This popsicle wrapper was too heavy a price for the sticky goodness. I regret accepting a free lunch.
I lived in a housing market like that. It was a college town dominated by a church subsidized school. The students had to live in on-campus, off-campus and registered, or unregulated housing. The only people allowed to do unregulated housing were those who had their stuff together e.g. married or living with family. Housing was cheap and any landlord disagreements could be complained against the uni housing office. The uni provided so much housing that prices were based on the uni's low cost instead of anything higher. A friend from high school had her dad choose to "invest" by buying a small apartment building out there, but even with his daughter as manager, he didn't make a good return because he didn't have the scale to provide the minimum level of service. I think he sold it.
Students there tended to get married and have children while still in school.
Long story short, housing market regulation can be done via a dominating entity over demand, but non market forces are not common everywhere.
Based on the other comments, i updated my post.
I appreciate the link. I read through it and it was primarily about general combustion, and mentioned that Wood smoke contained VOCs. I think CO might be one of those referenced, but the link did not go into any discussion of CO, so I would like to know how this "basic research" is relevant to our "CO" specific discussion.
Thanks for the correction. I updated my post.
First, i had enough pushback to get me to update the original post. I needed to say "generally doesn't make CO". This is based on wood definitely can emit CO when burning "charcoal" e.g. wood without enough O2 or fresh wood.
Regarding my rationale, I thought it had to do with the spacing or timing of the burn through each grain/fibre. Wood contains water/sap and would therefore have catalysts or contaminants that would change CO into something that would be easier to detect and remove (e.g. irritating ash) than any of the fossil fuels.
Wood fires generally do not produce co. Co comes from coal and natural gas and propane. I support redundancy of having a co detector, but not for your reasons.
Edit: Thanks for the correction. I added the word "generally". The primary reason for me saying that is that there were basically no deaths from CO while Korea had wood as their heat source then when coal was introduced, they suddenly had a huge spike in CO related deaths, and this warning came while I was doing some bushcrafting research for making charcoal. I thought it applied generally to all heating wood fires that are not first turned to charcoal.
I learned something today about something removed 35 years ago.
Planning my additional research, for someone alive to have gone to the temple and have done these, they would have to be at least 55ish. I'll try to find someone to talk about it.
I'm curious. The temple has 4 rituals
- baptism on behalf of your ancestral dead
- ritual washing
- promising 5 commandments that are above a regular baptisms promises to gain access to pass through to God's dwelling with power.
- marriage for all eternity.
Mormons dance around temple and associated rituals being sacred, not secret, so the command to not cast pearls before swine applies; but certain promises are not to share signals that show you made the extra promises, so just to be sure, mormons treat it all temple info as secret unless they actually thought about the words of the rituals.
I have been able to talk to Mormons outside of temples in pretty deep detail because I was respectful (not mocking).
Please be specific, what part seems to pantomime suicide? I'm thinking baptism on behalf of ancestors?
Shrug
There is a homophone in english: where's and wears. The joke is that you say it aloud and the emphasis on the sentence becomes a statement.
Where is the soap
Vs
It is wearing the soap down.
And all it sounds like is "weh-ers tha soap".
Ehh, it could have been covered by Romeo and Juliette laws, or he married her later, so I didn't focus on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decree_770?wprov=sfla1
I beg to differ, and i dont consider altering sex ed to be full evil. When people have a lot of money and power and political influence they can do some bad unethical things. Things like requiring "the correct race" to breed and "the incorrect race" to have forced military drafts and mobilizations. It's right now easier for other immediate goals to ... not go that route yet. Let the robots and automation catch up to the depopulation is my guess.