5y is the potential max sentence. The trial itself starts in September, I think.
In this sense, I feel that the writers of the article are attempting to rage-bait us. It definitely caught me.
It's fairly normal for prosecutors to charge more than will stick because we have guaranteed defense and due process, ostensibly.
You're not wrong, but I don't think you're 100% correct either. The human mind is able to synthesize reason by using a neural network to make connections and develop a profoundly complex statistical model using neurons. LLMs do the same thing, essentially, and they do it poorly in comparison. They don't have the natural optimizations we have, so they kinda suck at it now, but to dismiss the capabilities they currently have entirely is probably a mistake.
I'm not an apologist, to be clear. There is a ton of ethical and moral baggage tied up with the way they were made and how they're used and it needs addressed, andI think that we're only a few clever optimizations away from a threat.
Agreed. It's easy enough to spin though and could end up being deadly for Comey.
I just watched that and I'm sure we're on a list now. Or I moved up on the list I was on... Not sure how that works.
Although I found no evidence of this in the archives, this is believable. All the more reason to avoid the daily mail. Have a nice day Internet stranger.
I used to have it in my am pm pill box. It had some seriously deleterious effects when I accidentally took my pm in the am. It ruined my day. The depression was intense.
So, if your VPN provider is sold, why would you keep them unless you had pretty intimate knowledge of the buyer. Is that a dumb question?
This may explain why...
https://open.spotify.com/show/2U0Bi9u9LSoqs2rCk9sAuw
Here's a Spotify link for everyone.
I listened to a bit today. Not what I expected, but I like it a lot.
Ooh shit! I gotta read this. Thanks!
I've seen this elsewhere and it's had a very guilty till proven innocent feel to it.
I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.
E: see also https://beehaw.org/post/16953380 E2: https://19thnews.org/2024/11/4b-movement-south-korea-social-media-trump-presidency/
China accused the US of infiltrating Huawei Technologies Co. servers beginning in 2009, part of a broad-based effort to steal data that culminated in tens of thousands of cyber-attacks against Chinese targets last year.
The Tailored Access Operations unit of the National Security Agency carried out the attacks in 2009, which then continuously monitored the servers, China’s Ministry of State Security said in a post on its official WeChat account on Wednesday. It didn’t provide details of attacks since 2009.
Cyberattacks are a point of tension between Washington and Beijing, which has accused its political rival of orchestrating attacks against Chinese targets ever since Edward Snowden made explosive allegations about US spying. Washington and cybersecurity researchers have said the Asian country has sponsored attacks against the West.
The ministry’s accusations emerged as the two countries battle for technological supremacy. Huawei in particular has spurred alarm in Washington since the telecom leader unveiled a smartphone powered by an advanced chip it designed, which was made by Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. That’s in spite of years-long US sanctions intended to cut Huawei off from the American technology it needs to design sophisticated chips and phones.
Read more: US Probes Made-in-China Chip as Tensions Flare Over Technology
The US has been “over-stretching” the concept of national security with its clampdown on Chinese enterprises, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told reporters at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Wednesday.
“What we want to tell the US is that suppression and containing of China will not stop China’s development. It will only make us more resolved in our development,” Mao said.
On Tuesday, US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said she was “upset” when Huawei released the Mate 60 Pro during her visit to China last month, but noted the US has no evidence the Asian nation can make the advanced semiconductors powering the handset “at scale.”
It makes sense that you don't buy it. LLMs are built on simplified renditions of neural structure. They're totally rudimentary.