Uns auch, CSU.. uns auch!
Ist die Aussage des Satzes nicht eher, dass es diese Flaggen nicht als Emoji gibt?
Humans like any other animal have been moving around ever since and only recently we as a species have developed this idea of imaginary borders and sense of entitlement to the place we randomly got thrown into without any doing of our own.
You'll obviously find the concept of herds and territories also in animals, to be fair.
Also, given that we humans no longer only cater for ourselves and our direct surroundings, but luckily through social security systems also for people we don't know at all and never will but who are part of our "peer group called 'nation'", there has to be a line drawn to specify this group. Especially, since there is a very strict line drawn where our jurisdiction applies. I understand your humanistic and moral thinking, but still see these real obstacles in the way.
Dassault decides, and everyone else shuts up.
But of course, Dassault nevertheless wants the others to pay for their ideas..
Antony Blinken, Außenminister unter Joe Biden, hatte Anfang 2023 die Umstellung auf Calibri angeordnet.
Falls jemand sich gefragt haben sollte, was der eigentliche Grund für diesen Zirkus ist - auch wenn dieser dennoch vollkommen lächerlich ist.
..you forgot to downvote.
Just to recap:
You apparently feel threatened by nukes in your surroundings - I pointed out that Ukraine would not have to defend itself in a war if they still had nukes. So for them, it would not be a threat but a security for peace. Basically, check your privileges. And so far, you haven't presented anything substantial as a response to my question. Which is fine, but not my problem. So if you're out of arguments, we're done here I guess.
Ok, so you refuse to honestly answer the question.
Point proven, thanks.
How would Russia have invaded a Ukraine with nukes?
The point is: had Ukraine kept its nukes in the 90s instead of giving them away for a security treaty with Russia that Russia decided to just break, it wouldn't have to defend against the Russian war of aggression right now.
So while you think of nukes as a threat, keep in mind there's people in a war right now and not far away that wished they had kept theirs.
Looking at Ukraine: not having nukes does not guarantee peace, rather the contrary. Meanwhile, there haven't been that many foreign tanks attacking in those countries that live under the protection of nukes. It's ok to be hopeful, but let's also stay realistic.
Can you take your shitty nukes too so we’re no longer a target for your stupid war games?
Sorry, but to think Europe will no longer be threatened by nuclear weapons if the US will remove theirs is a bit naïve.
view more: next ›
Das stimmt schon, aber es ändert ja nichts an meiner Aussage, oder? Der hypothetische Wegfall von Automobil wird zu einer zunehmenden Konzentration von Nachfrage nach Wohnraum an "attraktiven" Standorten führen.
Das heißt zwar einerseits, dass seelenlose Übernachtungs-Neubausiedlungen endlich verschwinden werden, aber eben auch, dass schwächere Gruppen noch mehr als vorher an die Peripherie gedrängt werden, weil sie im dann zunehmenden Wettbewerb noch weniger bestehen als heute schon. Dann sind zwar die Innenstädte autofrei und grün, aber es wohnen eben auch nur noch die relativ wohlhabenden dort.