REDACTED

joined 9 months ago
[–] REDACTED 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Again, that is not a good training material. There have been numerous studies on the type of training data we feed and the result of it. This type of content tends to poison the data and lead to equalivent of brainrot for AI's. This is not very useful data for AI, there are far better sources. Again, seems highly illogical the EU would do all this just to train some shitty AI. Training material should also always be accompanied by context data, which is commonly missing from instant messaging. It's just too big of a mess.

[–] REDACTED -1 points 6 days ago (5 children)

My insight: EU is not interested in training AI for your corporations, neither are personal chats with likely zero accuracy/factuality good training material, neither is sms-style grammar going to improve any existing AI, everything about this is illogical and pretty stupid. It has always been about control, not.. training AI lol

[–] REDACTED 3 points 1 week ago

Isn't that just different front-end? I kinda doubt the detection system itself is different

[–] REDACTED 1 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Can we please stop circlejerking AI into everything? The chat control has been in debate before AI was mainstream

[–] REDACTED 1 points 1 week ago

Literally everything you just said is plain factually incorrect

Riiiiight, because you literally know better than my own eyes, someone who grew up in a farm and is currently living in rural region with many farms within 25km radius. See the batshit crazy part I'm talking about?

What it really comes down to is extreme avoidance of confronting your own cognitive dissonance. No one wants to believe that they do wrong. No one likes being confronted about their injustices. Your rights to live the way you want do not justify the harms that come to others as a result of that.

Again, I never said what I'm doing is moral, you're once again arguing something imaginary, going on a loop, like a batsh...

Those animals do not want to die no matter how tasty you think their flesh is. There's nothing religious or extreme about that, it's just a moral baseline.

Good job completely missing my entire point and deflecting it towards something completely else. At least you know your logical fallacy game, but no, once again, I never said the things you're claiming.

Crop deaths have been thoroughly debunked, the numbers of animals killed as a result of crop harvesting is so extremely overexaggerated that they are practically made up.

This is false and, ironically, debunked, but whatever feeda your cognitive affirmation.

Note that these are scientific papers, not news articles from buzzfeed and note that these are estimates, but backed by fairly trustable data and sources.

https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/animals/animals-11-01225/article_deploy/animals-11-01225-v2.pdf

https://r.jordan.im/download/crop-deaths/fischer2018.pdf

And once again, we can also use our own eyes. I know, its easier to trust random internet strangers who give you information that you want to hear, but I'm no longer seeing many cool species that were quite common 2 decades ago around fields that get sprayed, and then there's mountains of dead critters/insects. If pesticides were found to cause cancer in humans, think about what it does to smaller, more sensitive bodies, but no one really likes to talk about it because megacorporations like Monsanto are already getting too much attention, so they'd rather pay an university student to make a paper about how everything is fine while science itself is ringing alarm bells left and right.

And regardless of how many animals die of crop deaths, that would still be reason to eat plants instead of animals because animals need to be fed too, and it takes significantly more crops to feed animals for food than it takes to just eat plants directly.

That was never my argument. My argument was about the fact that there is no ethical mass produced food source on the planet, so stop acting all righteous and holy when your industry is killing the planet too.

Once again, I must ask you to leave other people alone. Let them live how they want. Things will go their natural way. Lab meat is going to likely become mainstream, pesticides are getting more and more regulated or sometimes even banned, etc. If you want to make a real change, become a scientist and start figuring out ways to mass-manufacture food in better ways.

Have you ever actually taken the time to just suspend your prejudice and actually hear what vegans have to say?

Once again, stop acting like we live in the dark. My own sister is a vegan who basically never shuts up about it. I've heard it all.

[–] REDACTED 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Dude.. just.. DUDE. How are you not self-aware by now? Please go back and read my original comment, and then look at this madness and wall of texts. You're nuts. Please leave me alone and let me live how I want to live, I'm not attacking you because your industry is wiping off entire species from earth, including my favourite species of frogs, not even talking about bees, so please stop coming at me for eating something that was never free to begin with and pretty much affects nothing, while your death machines stroll the fields killing everything in it's path (one time even a fox ran out from the field at me, scaring me, but it obviously looked so much in distress). You're literally acting like religious folks, homophobes, you're a perfect example of why I can never openly support vegans/vegetarians, because I do not wish to appear batshit crazy like you. It's like with feminism - the idea is good, but execution is so catasthropic you want to stay away from it with a 10 feet pole

It's also pretty weird that you people assume we don't know anything and you are the only person who discovered farming even tho I grew up in it. I literally live 5km from a farm I source my meat from and I can go have fun with cows (open area). Those shit farms are truly a rare thing and I'm not aware of a single one around, but ignore me, because people on tiktok and youtube know better.

[–] REDACTED 1 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What do you think would happen to the chickens if we released them all into the wild and never bothered to keep them alive? Why are your examples taken from the absolute worst farms that are getting closed down and the industry (at least where I live) is heavily regulated against that stuff?

[–] REDACTED 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Literally no one pays attention to that

[–] REDACTED 0 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Ahh, Spotted a vegan, because you blow things out of proportion and has twisted world view. No, Im not killing every other sentient thing. I'm not eating dogs, cats, or penguins. That being said, neither I'm out in the streets or forests killing animals, they're all farm animals that did not come into this world naturally under natural circumstances. I never said eating something that was alive and conscious like fish is a moral thing to do, I said people should live their own lives like they want to without getting religious folks (like you) getting all up in arms about what other people choose.

[–] REDACTED 1 points 1 week ago

You know it's bad when CCP starts telling their own people to behave when travelling

[–] REDACTED 1 points 1 week ago

I see russia finally afforded a new computer

[–] REDACTED 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm a special case though

You should put this info at the start of the comment so that people don't read the entire comment looking for something useful, but also, do you really not understand the difference between a test/checkup and therapy? Because you quoted the part about therapies, but started talking about tests

view more: ‹ prev next ›