RabbitBBQ

No one has any rights

Replace all politicans with AI first and then do everyone else. How difficult can it be to create an Agent that lies and steals from everyone?

ChatGPT 1.0 could replace this CEO

The problem with his argument, just to play devils advocate for what the right wing would say, is that local law enforcement has a responsibility to assist federal law enforcement to enforce federal laws even if they do not exist at the state level. The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution makes this very clear. With that being said, it is the role of the AG to resolve conflicts between state and federal law and from that perspective, they are also correct. At some point, it becomes a matter of what laws people choose to enforce, have the resources to enforce, or want to enforce or not for political reasons. This is kind of like the difference in federal classification of cannabis versus state classification of cannabis. If it is still illegal federally then in theory the feds can force the states to shut down cannabis shops and deport people. Just for clarity, the ancestors of the people being deported lived here long before the United States was created and have a right to be here and states have a right to determine the best path forward on cannabis. Just my personal opinion, but of course, even a state AG can have their opinion and there is always going to be a limit to their power. The Trump admin, Supreme Court, and Congress all on the other side of an issue makes it difficult to win. At the end of the day the truth is that there are not really any laws, the courts exist to determine things in favor of who has the most money, and money has bought everyone at all levels for a long time. It's only what those in power choose to enforce, or how they choose to resolve contradictory state and federal laws, or how they are paid to decide how to resolve it, and so no laws really exist, it's just up to whoever is in power at that point in time.

Certain addresses get flagged in bank and verification systems over time that are shared addresses among many people. Places where someone can get mail without a permanent legal address is one example. Shelters, general delivery at the post office, etc. So much of the concept of your identity is tied to your legal address. Courts can use this too and claim they can't find someone then issue default judgements against them. Meanwhile, so many places are heavily monitored because they have turned into police states, it is not usually in question for the goverment who someone is and where they are located. The post office should provide long term PO boxes for unhoused people for free and these should be accepted as legal addresses. But often, you'll find a PO Box isnt accepted.

Because it's not possible to tell any story about it without including Trump, the Clintons, and others.

When an issue crosses political lines where it becomes bi-partisan, such as bi-partisan corruption, things get weird.

If anyone knows who got tickled it's gonna be Elmo

Is the Hope and Change guy back again?

Walled gardens create digital plantations

It must be framed as keeping children and parents together