Bigger heatsink would be the target, but you gotta get it up there. On moon is not a half bad idea. Bury the heatsink and use the moon itself might be the best idea, depending on how quickly it can absorb then dissipate the heat through the righlith. The side of the moon doesn't matter as there isn't an actual 'dark side' of the moon, just a side we can't see do to tidal locking. That side still gets the same amount of sun.
Securus777
joined 8 months ago
What is it called?
Had to finish my taxes today so couldn't watch but for sure looking forward to it tomorrow!
I'm pretty sure it's suspended by a magnetic field, just like were trying to do with our fusion reactors. Could be wrong though.
Book is the source material, though haven't read it yet.
Sadly still magnetic force that loses strength exponentially based on distance
I could be wrong but as I understand it. You know magnetism based on positive and negative poles, now they can read and write SPIN, which is another property of electrons (that are in everything, even things nonmagnetic). If it's true, and scales, we could use non-ferrous better materials to achieve what we do currently with ferrous materials.
Great to see. Does seam like an odd choice not to have both nics be 2.5 though.
I have a sol-ark and like it though this is concerning. In this case it's dyne on dyne branded and sol-ark has nothing to do with it, as far as we are aware.
If you don't care about the pretty graphs and data points and just want it to do it's job, then getting whatever inverter you want and not connecting to the net solves this problem. Alternatively, locking down traffic to and from this device is something I'll be looking at.
There are dozens of us! Dozens!
view more: next ›
Where'd ya go? Were looking to do the same.