IMO, it's pretty good. I've really only got two criticisms. I don't like the active component of combat in my turn based games, but that's pretty minor. My bigger gripe is that I think the last act of the story sucks.
I was so strong at this point that boss mechanics were purely optional to me, I was capable of one shotting everything.
Also a lot of the human characters do things that made me dislike them in the final act.
Used to use vscode, then one day it stopped working for me. I've been using Helix full time for a few months now and I'm pretty happy with it.
I remember being taught phonics in primary school in the 2000's, and I went to a public school so I don't understand why we think this is revolutionary either. Maybe it's just new in VIC? I'm from QLD
The steam page doesn't say anything about PSN accounts right now. Maybe it'll get updated, but right now it looks good.
In my local currency (Aussie Dollars) AAA games cost $120. Like, man, I'm not spending $120 on a game. I can't remember the last time I bought a game at that price.
MDN says you're right because innerHTML is un-escaped and you're probably trying to use textContent. Didn't know about this one, thanks.
Isn't the "passive aggressive licence" just MIT?
I don't think I've ever seen someone say that upscaling OPTIONS are bad but I'm worried about games like monster hunter where upscaling and frame gen is used to make the game playable in most cases.
Didn't even know this existed lol, crazy how decentralised the game industry has become now that e3 is gone. There's no official "time to announce your games" part of the year anymore.
I hate to be all doom and gloom but if the government decided tomorrow that disagreeing with trump was a crime then it's probably already too late for you.
The amount of information about people online is pretty shocking and no amount of cleaning up after yourself could save you at this point.
On the other hand, it probably won't devolve that fast so you're probably ok?
FYI Android is not about to become closed source. Google has their own internal dev branch and the publicly available main AOSP branch, this is already known. What they're doing is simplifying their release process so that rather than having two "main" branches AOSP will be downstream from their dev branch.