StewieTheThird

joined 2 years ago
 

A discussion about the ethics of being a content creator or a fan and the implications of that influence.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

Exactly, but what, personally, I feel is worse is that they let those comments feed to each other, like-minded bigots. Allowing it to fester together and create a rot in the forest that eventually spreads outward taking the woods down with it.

 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/13478112

As a general trigger warning, the first section of the post shows some examples of the content Meta is ignoring: transphobia, homophobia, etc.

 

As a general trigger warning, the first section of the post shows some examples of the content Meta is ignoring: transphobia, homophobia, etc.

 

Gatekeepers ruin everything; they will always be there, waiting in the shadows to tell you how you aren’t really that into something—or letting you know that what you like isn’t respectable enough to be a fan.

We have all experienced it, no matter what community it is, no matter what kind of fandom. You will always have someone trying to gatekeep what it means to be a fan—telling you the barrier you have to meet in order to “really” appreciate something.

Read the latest Socratically Post diving into the topic

 

Real Estate Agent Simulator is the debut PC game from Turkish developers KiKi Games.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Being completely transparent I don't care if there are any health risks associated with it for the greater population. I am just allergic to it and it gives me the worst shits possible, so if we could stop putting it in things that would be killer. It's in every gum now so I just can't buy gum anymore.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Its not that hard to fathom when you have worked with these types of people.

All it was was a numbers meeting, no User Experience folks in the room. They said how much revenue they would increase quarter over quarter, and how much engagement it would drive. Everyone claps, the meeting ends they move forward with the next terrible design decision. Companies no longer take focus group testing seriously for anything.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Science already has an established method for debating and refuting scientific findings/claims. So this idea that we need to make a spectacle out of it is so disingenuous on its face. "oh but if they know what they are talking about it would be easy to defend in a debate", but it goes the other way. Then they keep moving the goal posts on what qualifies as a "real" scientific test, and I just can't have a good faith conversation with these people. I'll correct people in real life, but the internet is a cesspool and I don't have the patience.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Yakuza - any of them honestly. They run so well on the SD it’s incredible.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I use discord for 2 things, my personal group chat with friends that I manage, and keeping up with Mechanical Keyboard artisan shops and manufacturers. So I mean it wont be a huge leap for me to migrate to something better.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is essentially where I am with it. I get the outrage but for now I don’t have an issue. But likely as with many things lately, we should maybe pursue the federated option.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Yeah adding to this if you just removed every post (like some subreddits) then no one knows what was removed and why. Sure with lemmys mod log you could deep dive in to find the reason (if given) but publicly saying “calm down not welcome behavior” can be a useful tool to reinforce to everyone where the administrators stand. It also provides a transparency to everyone else to also allow us to keep our admins in check. Well as far as we can given we don’t own the instance as users.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

On here? not possible, the beehaw community this is hosted on has downvotes disabled. Unless you mean on yt which all i can say to that is "its youtube".

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Accounts are created on registration so while you may not have been approved it’s possible that is your account.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 39 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They really did recommend Digg as an alternative to Reddit. Some stubborn exec at Digg is punching the air right now.

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean genuinely if your charging for access to the content I have created then I am I entitled to a portion of your revenue. Same as Adsense on YT not that I want to turn it into a race to the bottom for engagement like those scenarios are conducive to. But if we want to make it about money we can make it about money /u/spez.

If I were an executive and If I was even 2% clued into the effect this is having on shifting the conversation to fediverse type projects I would be shitting myself. Not because this will have an immediately noticeable effect on my bottom line, but that it will continue to grow organically. We already crossed the threshold of momentum needed to self sustain, its all up from here especially as the tools and systems mature.

Just look at the tech literate around us start to question “yeah why the fuck are we leaving social media in the hands of corporations???”

 

Hey Beehaw support folks!

Is there an official policy on multiple accounts? I realized that I defaulted to my backup username (this one) and attempted to claim Stewie. I was able to submit my application and I am pretty sure its just waiting for approval (no rush) But I can't tell if the existing user I found with /u/Stewie is the one I made or if someone elsemade it at the same time I did.

view more: next ›