No.
Tamo240
joined 2 years ago
The courts can only interpret the law. The wording of the law refers to 'sex' i.e. Biological sex, not gender, hence the ruling.
Only the media is talking about the 'definition of a woman'. This is not what the ruling is on.
That isn't to say that the equalities act shouldn't be changed to also include gender, I strongly believe it should and hope against hope that the Labour government will, but it is not in the supreme court's power to enact new law.
Lack of understanding of the legal system leads to a lot of misdirected anger, I'm on your side, but be angry at the right people.
You'll be a better programmer in any language if you can understand a systems language like C. No need to become an expert, just the basics of manual memory management will help you understand what other languages are hiding from you.
Don't you dare remind me how long ago 2010 was
Or provide UBI to share the wealth generated by increased societal productivity
The stories don't have to be true for the actual history of who did what and why to be interesting.
Play a different game
Not to be that guy but a Large Language Model doesn't generate images. This Is from a diffusion model
There is only one season of Altered Carbon
That is also my point. Don't worry though, you keep impeaching him until he dissolves congress.
You're response being 'yeah but you can be impeached multiple times' exactly demonstrates the weakness of that action.
I only use it when I know exactly the code I'm trying to produce, but just saving time if it can write it for me. Somewhere I saw this described as 'toil' vs. 'domain knowledge', and it definitely reduces toil even if I have to correct it. Anywhere that I wouldn't know how to correct it, I don't trust it.